[CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:09] ORDER OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 15TH, 2026 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 300 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD, BUILDING, 100 WYLIE, TEXAS. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. FIRST, WE'LL START OUT WITH THE INVOCATION AND COMMISSIONER CHANDLER WILL BE GIVING THE INVOCATION AND THEN THE PLEDGE, AND COMMISSIONER BUTLER WILL BE DOING THE PLEDGE. PLEASE RISE. MR. PRESIDENT, THANK YOU FOR BRINGING US HERE TODAY, KEEPING US SAFE TODAY, AS WE DO IN OUR TRAVELS. AND THANK YOU FOR BRINGING US ALL IN THIS MEETING. GIVE US THE WISDOM TO MAKE THE CORRECT DECISION, LORD, AND YOUR GUIDANCE LORD. IN JESUS NAME WE PRAY. AMEN. AMEN, AMEN. PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. OKAY, AT THIS TIME, I'LL ASK IF THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS ON ANY NON AGENDA ITEMS. ANYBODY? NOT HEARING ANY. THEN I WILL CONSIDER A MOTION. NO, JUST MOVE ON. ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT COMMENTS ON NON AGENDA ITEMS. THAT'S JUST YOU JUST MOVE ON OKAY. CONSENT AGENDA. REMEMBER. OKAY THEN. NEXT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA TO ANY COMMISSIONERS. HAVE ANY [CONSENT AGENDA] COMMENTS. WISH TO PULL ANYTHING OFF CONSENT AGENDA OR ANYTHING ELSE. IF NOT THEN I WILL ACCEPT A MOTION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION. DO WE HAVE A SECOND TO ACCEPT THE CONSENT AGENDA? I'LL SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. PLEASE VOTE. IT PASSED. OKAY. ON TO THE REGULAR AGENDA FOR TONIGHT. ITEM NUMBER ONE. [1. Consider, and act upon, a site plan amendment for Wal-Mart being on Lot 1, Block A of Creekside Retail Addition, for EV parking stall and pharmacy drive-through improvements. Property located at 1400 McCreary Road. ] CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR WALMART BEING ON LOT ONE, BLOCK A OF CREEKSIDE RETAIL ADDITION FOR EV PARKING STALLS AND PHARMACY DRIVE THRU IMPROVEMENTS. PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1400 MCCREARY ROAD, COMMON. YES. GOOD EVENING. OUR FIRST ITEM ON THE REGULAR AGENDA IS A REQUEST FOR A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE WALMART LOCATED ON MCCRARY ROAD. IT'S AT 1400 MCCREARY ROAD, AND THE PURPOSE FOR THE SITE PLAN AMENDMENT IS TO ALLOW FOR THE ADDITION OF EV PARKING STALLS, AND THEY'RE ACTUALLY ADDING A SECOND LANE FOR THEIR PHARMACY DRIVE THROUGH SERVICE. SO THIS SECOND IMAGE SHOWS THE THE AREAS THAT ARE BEING AFFECTED BY THIS SITE PLAN. AND THEN THEY ARE PROVIDING SCREENING ALONG MCCREARY ROAD FOR THE EV EQUIPMENT. AND THAT'S I'LL SHOW IT IN THIS IMAGE RIGHT HERE. SO THEY'RE DOING CRAPE MYRTLE TREES THAT ARE AT LEAST SIX FEET IN HEIGHT. AND THIS IS AN IMAGE OF THE EXISTING AREA. SO THEY ALSO HAVE A SCREENING WALL ALONG THE NORTHERN BORDER. SO JUST IMAGINE MORE LANDSCAPING BEING PLACED IN THIS AREA RIGHT HERE. AND THEN THIS IS THEIR CURRENT PHARMACY DRIVE THRU PICKUP AREA. THEY'RE ESSENTIALLY ADDING ANOTHER DRIVE THRU LANE WITH A CANOPY. SO IT'S SHIFTING THIS FIRE LANE FURTHER TO THE SOUTH. AND THE PARKING ROWS ARE ALSO GOING TO BE SHIFTED TO THE SOUTH. I CAN SHOW THAT ON THIS NEXT IMAGE RIGHT HERE. SO YOU CAN SEE THERE'S TWO DRIVE THRU LANES NOW. AND THEN THE NEW FIRE LANE. THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE TO DO SOME REPLANTING AND AMENDED PLAT TO, TO REESTABLISH THAT FIRE LANE. FURTHER TO THE SOUTH, YOU'LL SEE THAT YOU MIGHT NOT SEE THAT SINCE THAT COULD BE APPROVED ADMINISTRATIVELY, BUT IT'LL HAPPEN. SO AND THEN THESE ARE THE ELEVATIONS AS WELL. IT'S [00:05:08] GOING TO MATCH THE EXISTING LOOK OF THE WALMART WITH THE BRANDING. AND IT IS A PRE MANUFACTURED METAL CANOPY THAT THEY'RE PROPOSING. WITH THAT I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS. IF NONE THEN I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN AS PRESENTED. BEEN MOVED TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER ONE. SECOND THE MOTION A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER ONE. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. I'M MISSING ONE. WHO? I'M SORRY. MOTION PASSES. ON TO ITEM NUMBER TWO. HOLD A PUBLIC [2. Hold a Public Hearing, consider, and act upon, a recommendation to City Council regarding the writing of an ordinance for a change in zoning from Planned Development 2017-04 Single-Family District (PD2017 04-SF) to Planned Development 2026-13-Single-Family (PD2026-XX-SF) to remove references, rights and obligations with respect to the Stonehaven House. Property generally located at the northwest corner of Ballard Avenue and Alanis Drive. (ZC 2026-13). ] HEARING. CONSIDER AND ACT UPON THE RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE WRITING OF AN ORDINANCE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. 20 1704 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT PD 2017-04- SF TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 2020 613 SINGLE FAMILY PD 2026XXSF TO REMOVE REFERENCES, RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE STONEHAVEN HOUSE PROPERTY, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BOULDER BALL, BALLARD AVENUE AND ALANIS DRIVE. Z. C2026-13 AND WE HAVE A GUEST THIS EVENING. YOU HAVE A GUEST? I'M RENEE ALI, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER FOR HERE FOR THE CITY. THE ITEM BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING IS TO CONSIDER A REQUEST TO REMOVE ALL REFERENCE TO THE STONEHAVEN HOUSE FROM THE BODY OF THE CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE. I'M NOT SURE HOW MANY OF YOU MAY, MAY OR MAY NOT KNOW. WE STARTED ON THIS PROJECT ORIGINALLY BACK IN 2015, I BELIEVE WAS THE FIRST ORDINANCE, AND THEN IT WAS AMENDED IN 2017 TO ALLOW FOR SOME LARGER LOTS ALONG ALANIS. I DO BELIEVE AT THE TIME OF THE APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE, THERE WAS LANGUAGE TO RELOCATE THE STONEHAVEN HOUSE. IT ORIGINALLY SET KIND OF ON THE HARD CORNER OF ALANIS AND BALLARD. IT HAD TO BE SHIFTED 400FT TO THE NORTH DUE TO THE WIDENING OF ALANIS. OVER THE YEARS, COVID FINANCING JUST A WHOLE SLEW OF THINGS. THE HOUSE HAS KIND OF GONE UNREPAIRED, IN DISARRAY, SO. I GUESS OVER THE LAST TWO YEARS, STAFF HAS HAD MANY CONVERSATIONS WITH A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT ENTITIES THAT WANTED TO LEASE THE PROPERTY, ULTIMATELY RELOCATE THE HOUSE TO A DIFFERENT LOCATION AT THE DIRECTION OF COUNCIL. THEY DID SELECT AN ENTITY TO GO WITH MR. JAMES PRIVETT OUT OF MELISSA, WHO ALSO HAS DONE A HISTORIC HOMES. SO IN ALL OF THAT, WE CAME ACROSS LANGUAGE THAT WAS WRITTEN IN THE WHAT IS IT CALLED, THE CRS, THE CONVENIENCE AND COVENANT DOCUMENTS FOR STONEHAVEN, FOR STONE RANCH SUBDIVISION THAT ACTUALLY HAD LANGUAGE THAT SAID THE STONE FAMILY HOUSE WOULD BE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. WE ALSO HAVE THAT SIMILAR LANGUAGE IN OUR ZONING ORDINANCE OR NOT, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AT THE REQUEST OF OUR CITY ATTORNEY, THEY FELT LIKE WE SHOULD REMOVE ALL LANGUAGE THAT RELATES TO THE STONE HOUSE IN THE EVENT THAT IT IS RELOCATED. THE GOAL IS TO RELOCATE THE HOUSE TO DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT. SO WHAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING IS ALL THE LANGUAGE WITHIN THE CURRENT PD THAT TALKS ABOUT THE HOUSE BEING MOVED TO PARK PROPERTY, THAT THE WILY HISTORIC SOCIETY WILL TAKE RESPONSIBILITY. ALSO, THE RESPONSIBILITY THAT THE CITY WOULD HAVE FOR THE HOUSE IS [00:10:07] BEING PROPOSED TO REMOVE THAT LANGUAGE. I HAVE SPOKEN WITH THE LEADERSHIP GROUP FOR THE HOA, FOR STONEHAVEN, FOR STONE RANCH. THEY ARE ALSO IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO AMEND THEIR CC. THAT'S A LITTLE BIT MORE DIFFICULT. THERE ARE OVER 200, I BELIEVE, HOMES THERE BY THEIR CRS. THEY. THEY REQUIRE 67% OF THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO AMEND THEIR RULES AND REGULATIONS. AS OF TODAY, THEY HAVE RECEIVED 38 VOTES. THEY DID AN ONLINE VOTE, SO THEY RECEIVED 38. THEY NEED A TOTAL OF 155. OUR HOPE IS THAT THEY'LL GET IT. IT'S NOT 100% NECESSARY THAT WE NEED IT FOR THE SIMPLE REASON THE CITY HAS NO AUTHORITY OVER THEIR CC AND OURS. WE CAN'T REGULATE THEM, WE CAN'T ENFORCE THEM OR ANYTHING. BUT WE FELT THE NEED TO AT LEAST GO AHEAD AND GET THE CITY'S PART AMENDED. SO THAT IS WHAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING, THERE WERE 224 NOTICES THAT WERE MAILED OUT, AND KEVIN DID PASS OUT TO YOU ALL. I THINK AS OF TODAY, THE COP, THE. THEY GOT ADDITIONAL RESPONSES BACK FROM THOSE NOTICES. SO AS OF TODAY, OF THE 224, WE HAD. 18 RETURNED IN FAVOR, THREE OPPOSED AND ONE THAT WAS RETURNED, BUT DID NOT HAVE A RESPONSE. EXCUSE ME, I HAVE TO APOLOGIZE. COULD YOU PLEASE, FOR THE AUDIENCE AND EVERYONE ELSE COULD PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS? I'M SORRY. RENEE OLLEY, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, 300, COUNTRY CLUB, BUILDING 100. THANK YOU. SO WITH THAT, I'LL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE OR ANYTHING. ANYBODY ON SO AM I. AM I UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CITY IS ANTICIPATING TO MOVE IT TO TO THE DOWNTOWN AREA, TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT? CORRECT? CORRECT. IS THAT SET IN STONE OR IS IT STILL IT IS NOT SET IN STONE. THE AGREEMENT. WE HAVE NOT SIGNED THE AGREEMENT WITH MR. PRIVETT. IT IS. WE WANT TO GET THIS PART DONE FIRST. BUT CITY COUNCIL DID APPROVE US TO MOVE FORWARD WITH DRAFTING THE AGREEMENT WITH MR. PRIVETT, WHO WILL FIND A LOT DOWNTOWN. THE CITY WILL PAY FOR THE RELOCATION TO HAVE THE HOUSE MOVE, AND THEN IT WILL BE ALL ON MR. PRIVETT. OKAY. AND WHAT HAPPENS IF THAT IF IF THAT DOESN'T GO THROUGH AND WE. AND I MEAN, SO IT SOUNDS LIKE HE DOESN'T EVEN HAVE A LOT FOR IT DOWNTOWN. SO WHAT HAPPENS IF IT DOESN'T GET MOVED? AND WHAT WHAT DOES THIS DO TO, TO THE STATUS OF IT THEN CURRENTLY A COUPLE OF OPTIONS. COUNCIL COULD DIRECT US TO GO WITH A DIFFERENT ENTITY THAT MAY HAVE A LOT OR YEAH, THAT MAY HAVE A LOT. OR THE HOUSE COULD SIT THERE AND WE GO FROM THERE. THE HOPE IS THAT THE HOUSE WILL BE RELOCATED AND THEN ON THE PROPERTY, BECAUSE WHERE THE HOUSE SITS NOW IS CURRENTLY PARK LAND THAT IS OWNED BY THE CITY. SO THE HOPE IS ONCE THE HOUSE IS RELOCATED, THAT WE WILL, I DON'T KNOW IF IT'LL BE A MONUMENT, A PAVILION OR SOMETHING THAT WILL BE PUT IN ITS PLACE TO STILL RECOGNIZE THE STONE FAMILY. I WANT TO SAY. AND THEN THAT WAS MY LAST QUESTION WAS WHAT IS THE HAVE YOU TALKED WITH THE STONE FAMILY AT ALL? I KNOW THERE'S STILL PEOPLE THAT LIVE HERE IN THE TOWN AND WHAT THEIR THEIR THOUGHTS. I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY ONE THAT LIVES IN TOWN. THE CURRENT OR I GUESS THE NEXT DESCENDANT, MISS CHARLOTTE STOECKEL, LIVES, I BELIEVE IN PENNSYLVANIA. WE HAVE BEEN IN COMMUNICATION, IN COMMUNICATION WITH HER. SHE DID DO AN OPEN RECORDS REQUEST AND ASKED FOR UPDATED INFORMATION. WE SENT ALL THAT TO HER AND I HAVE NOT HEARD BACK FROM HER SINCE. ALL RIGHT, ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. AND I DID MENTION TO HER IN THE PAST THAT IF THE HOUSE IS RELOCATED, WE WOULD LIKE TO DO SOMETHING ON THAT PARK LAND. IN RECOGNITION OF HER FAMILY. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND WE'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS SUBJECT? OKAY. THIS IS ON. OKAY. WE HAVE ONE. MEMORY. WILKINS, WILKES [00:15:05] AND MICHAEL. OKAY. COME ON DOWN. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. MY NAME IS MEMORY WILKES, AND I LIVE AT 715 WEST WIND WAY, WYLIE, TEXAS, 75098. THANK YOU. WE'VE LIVED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD FOR A LITTLE OVER 20 YEARS, AND I MISS THE COWS. I. I JUST FEEL LIKE WYLIE OWES THE STONE FAMILY THAT PROPERTY WAS DONATED. WE'RE COLLECTING A TON OF TAXES, AND WE CAN'T TAKE CARE OF THAT HOUSE. IT DISGUSTS ME. THAT IS A PART OF OUR HISTORY. SORRY. A PART OF OUR HISTORY HERE IN WYLIE AND WE'RE JUST THROWING IT AWAY. WE MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE A MONUMENT THAT'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH. IT MAY OR MAY NOT GET A PLACE DOWNTOWN THAT'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH. THAT'S CHEAPING OUT. AND WYLIE'S BETTER THAN THAT. WE TALK ABOUT THE WYLIE WAY. WE RAISE OUR KIDS BETTER THAN EVERYBODY ELSE, AND YET WE'RE GOING TO POOP ON HISTORY. WE CAN'T DO THAT. WE GOT TO DO BETTER. I JUST I BELIEVE IN WYLIE BETTER THAN THAT, THAT'S ALL. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO. WOULD YOU LIKE TO. YEAH, IF YOU'D LIKE TO RESPOND. YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR ME? NO, I REALLY DON'T HAVE A RESPONSE OTHER THAN, YOU KNOW, PART OF WHAT SHE SAYS IS TRUE. YEAH. WE DIDN'T WE DIDN'T MAINTAIN THE HOUSE. WE DID A STUDY IN 20, EXCUSE ME, IN 2019. AND IT WAS GOING TO COST ABOUT $800,000 TO FIX THE HOUSE UP. AND THEN COVID HAPPENED. AND THERE WERE OTHER PRIORITIES. DO I THINK WE'RE THROWING AWAY WYLIE'S HISTORY? NO, I DON'T I THINK WE'RE LOOKING FOR EVERY SOLUTION THAT WE CAN TO HAVE THE HOUSE RELOCATED TO THE DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT, WHERE IT WILL ADHERE TO HISTORIC STANDARDS, AND THAT THE HISTORY OF THE STONE FAMILY HOUSE CAN LIVE ON. THAT'S ALL. OKAY. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT? IF NOT, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY COMMENTS? QUESTIONS? MR. CHAIRMAN, I WOULD ASK THAT IF THE COMMISSION DOES VOTE TO APPROVE THIS, THAT YOU WOULD MAKE ONE SMALL CHANGE. IN THE REPORT. IT SAYS THAT THE STONE FAMILY HOUSE WILL BE RELOCATED. SO I I'M ASKING THAT WE JUST TAKE ALL OF THAT LANGUAGE OUT. SO THAT WOULD BE. IF YOU SEE LET ME SEE IN YOUR PACKET ON THE SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE CHANGES AS FOLLOWS. IT SAYS THE STONE FAMILY HOUSE WILL BE MOVED TO PARKLAND, WHICH IS MARKED OUT AND THEN SAYS RELOCATED FROM THE PROPERTY. IF WE WOULD JUST STRIKE THAT ENTIRE SENTENCE OUT. RIGHT HERE. SO I DO HAVE ONE OTHER QUESTION, BECAUSE I SAW IN SOME OF THE COMMENTS AND IN THE LADY MADE, SO DID THE CITY RECEIVE FUNDS OR RECEIVE MONEY THEN FROM FROM THROUGH THE STONE FAMILY OR THROUGH THE PROCESS FOR THE FOR THE PROPERTY AT ALL OR NO, THE CITY DID NOT. THE. MISS CHARLOTTE SOKOL DONATED A DON'T QUOTE ME ON THIS, BUT I THINK IT WAS LIKE $39,000 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT THAT THEY GAVE TO THE HISTORIC SOCIETY, WHO IN TURN GAVE THAT TO THE MOVER, WHO RELOCATED THE HOUSE, THE 400FT NORTH, SO THAT MONEY WAS ALL SPENT JUST TO MOVE IT FROM IT. AND THEN YES. AND THEN THE DEVELOPER, I THINK IT WAS A TOTAL OF JUST UNDER 70,000. SO MR. COLE PAID HALF IN THE DEVELOPER. DEVELOPER PAID THE OTHER HALF. SO I GUESS MY QUESTION STILL IS IF, IF, IF WE GET IN THE LIMBO WHERE IT DOESN'T LIKE IF WE'RE REMOVING ALL THIS FROM THE ORDINANCE AND AND THEN YOU KNOW THAT IF THEY CAN'T FIND A PROPERTY DOWNTOWN, I MEAN, IT'S NOT NECESSARILY EASY TO FIND PROPERTY DOWNTOWN HERE NECESSARILY. YOU KNOW, WHAT ARE WE IS THERE SOMETHING, A CHALLENGE THAT WE COULD BE PUTTING OURSELVES INTO? OR WHY CAN'T WE JUST WAIT UNTIL WE ACTUALLY HAVE THE SOMEONE THAT'S GOING TO HAVE PROPERTY TO KNOW WHERE IT'S GOING TO GO [00:20:04] BEFORE WE GO THROUGH WITH THIS PROCESS? RIGHT. AND I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, AND THIS WAS AT THE SUGGESTION OF OUR ATTORNEYS THAT THIS PART OF THE ORDINANCE BE CHANGED BEFORE WE RELOCATE THE HOUSE OR BEFORE WE SIGN THE AGREEMENT WITH THE POTENTIAL DEVELOPER. AND WE HAVE NOT SIGNED THAT AGREEMENT YET. RIGHT. WELL, CAN'T WE WAIT UNTIL THAT EVERYTHING ALL THAT FINALIZED AND THEN COME BACK AND DO THAT AND DO THIS APPROVAL? NO, BECAUSE. BY THIS ORDINANCE AND WITH THE LANGUAGE IN THE CC THAT SAYS THE HOUSE IS AN INTEGRAL PART, THE AGAIN, IT'S A SUGGESTION BY THE ATTORNEYS. IT'S NOT A LAW THAT THIS PART OF THE ORDINANCE BE CORRECTED FIRST BEFORE WE ENTER INTO THE AGREEMENT WITH. RIGHT. BUT WE COULD HAVE THE WE COULD HAVE THE AGREEMENT FINALIZED AND EVERYTHING BEFORE. AND THEN, I MEAN, I'M ASSUMING THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK WITH A. WITH THE AGREEMENT WOULD BE FINALIZED. WE WOULD HAVE THEY WOULD THE, THE THE NEW PURCHASER WOULD HAVE THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED DOWNTOWN. ALL THAT. AND THEN BEFORE WE ENTER THAT AGREEMENT, CAN WE COME BACK AND THEN GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS AT THAT POINT IN TIME AND WAIT AND JUST AND THEN SIGN THE AGREEMENT AFTER WE'VE REMOVED THIS STUFF FROM THE ORDINANCE AT THAT POINT IN TIME. NOT AT THE SUGGESTION OF THE ATTORNEY. THAT'S THAT'S ALL I IS IT IS IT A LEGAL ISSUE OR IS IT JUST THEY WANT TO MOVE FAST FOR IT? I MEAN, THAT'S MY CONCERN IS I THINK IT'S WE'RE MOVING REALLY FAST ON SOMETHING LIKE THIS THAT'S GOING. AND, AND I THINK THAT WE CAN I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW, I DON'T KNOW WHY, WHAT THE RUSH IS TO DO THIS BECAUSE IT WORRIES ME THAT WE'RE GOING TO GET STUCK IN. WE'RE GOING TO GET STUCK IN SOMEWHERE WITH THE CITY IS GOING TO GET STUCK WITH SOMETHING. AND THEN AND I MEAN, I REMEMBER I'VE BEEN I MEAN, I WAS ON THE ARTS BOARD, PUBLIC ARTS BOARD MANY YEARS AGO. AND I MEAN, WE EVEN TALKED ABOUT THAT PROPERTY MANY, MANY TIMES BACK IN 2015, 2016, WHEN IT WAS FIRST HAPPENING. AND SO, I MEAN, IT'S KIND OF FRUSTRATED ME AS WELL AS I THINK MANY OTHER PEOPLE AS TO WHAT'S HAPPENED THERE. AND YES, AND I GUESS I'M JUST CONCERNED THAT THAT I'M SURPRISED THAT THE CITY IS GETTING RID OF IT AND JUST WANTING TO TURN IT OVER TO BECAUSE IT'S FOR ME, IT SEEMS LIKE WE'RE JUST KIND OF DITCHING SOMETHING OFF AND DOING THAT. SO. YES, I DON'T I MEAN, I JUST DON'T, I DON'T, I DON'T KNOW THAT WE'RE AT THE RIGHT TIME THAT WE NEED TO DO THIS RIGHT THIS MOMENT IN TIME. MY OPINION IS BY CHANGING THE ORDINANCE NOW DOESN'T HURT OR IT DOESN'T HURT BECAUSE IF WE CHANGE THE ORDINANCE TO REMOVE THE LANGUAGE AND SAY, 30 DAYS DOWN THE ROAD, MR. PRIVET DOES NOT SIGN THE AGREEMENT FOR WHATEVER REASON, WE'RE STILL NOT OUT OF ANYTHING. THE HOUSE CAN STILL STAY THERE. OR IF WE DECIDE TO MOVE IT SOMEWHERE ELSE, THAT COULD HAPPEN. WELL, BUT IS IT THE OTHER THING TOO? I MEAN, I AM A LAWYER. THE OTHER THING TOO, HE MAY NOT WANT TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT IF THAT'S STILL IN PLACE, AND THEN IT COMES IN FRONT OF US AND THEN WE DENY THAT LANGUAGE. AND SO IT BECOMES AN ISSUE OF HIM TRYING TO MOVE IT WHILE THE ORDINANCE IS STILL THERE, BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T VOTED ON IT. WE HAVEN'T SAID IF WE'RE GOING TO DO IT OR NOT. SO. RIGHT. BUT I THINK THAT YOU I MEAN, YOU DO HAVE IT. I MEAN, IF WE IF THE IF THE PROPERTY IS THERE, BUT THEN WE'VE REMOVED ANY REQUIREMENTS FOR US TO HAVE IT IN THE PROPERTY, HAVE THE PROPERTY THERE. THEN THERE'S, I MEAN, WHAT'S TO SAY THAT IT JUST CAN'T JUST BE SOMEDAY TORN DOWN AND TAKEN AWAY BECAUSE IT'S NO LONGER IN THE ORDINANCES OR ANYTHING THAT WE HAVE TO HAVE IT THERE. AND IF WE DON'T HAVE THE THING, THEN I'M WORRIED THAT IT'S JUST GOING TO BE TORN DOWN AND TAKEN AWAY. AND THEN IF WE DON'T EVEN HAVE ANY KIND OF AGREEMENT FOR WHAT WE'RE GOING TO, HOW WE'RE GOING TO HONOR THE STONE FAMILY WITH IT, YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT'S THAT'S JUST MY CONCERN IS THAT IT'S, IT'S, WE'RE MOVING REALLY FAST WITH THIS. AND, AND IT'S NOT NECESSARILY SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE TO DO WITH RIGHT AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME. THE REALITY IS WE COULD TEAR THE HOUSE DOWN NOW, BUT I MEAN, THAT'S NOT THE DESIRE, BUT THE WAY THE ORDINANCE IS WRITTEN DOESN'T STOP US FROM TEARING THE HOUSE DOWN. AGAIN. THAT IS NOT THE DESIRE OF STAFF, NOR IS IT THE DESIRE. BUT ISN'T IT IN THERE BECAUSE IT SAYS IT'S AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE PROPERTY. SO THAT, I MEAN, THAT'S WHAT IT SAYS IN THE CC, RIGHT? SO IF WE CAN'T, IF WE DON'T REMOVE THAT, WE DON'T REMOVE THIS THEN THEN BECAUSE IF IT GETS REMOVED, THEN, THEN THAT WOULD MEAN IF WE DON'T REMOVE THAT, THEN WE CAN'T, WE CAN'T GO AND JUST TEAR IT DOWN BECAUSE IT SAYS IN THERE THAT IT'S AN INTEGRAL PART. SO WE'D HAVE TO I MEAN, YOU CAN'T JUST TEAR DOWN AN INTEGRAL PART. WE HAVE NO AUTHORITY OVER WHAT THE CC AND R SAY. CAN I? THE ONE THING I MENTIONED IS, YOU KNOW, YOU TALKED ABOUT MOVING FAST, AND I'D HAVE TO DISAGREE WITH THAT BECAUSE IT'S BEEN AT COUNCIL FOR SIX MONTHS, PROBABLY. THEY'VE BEEN GOING BACK AND FORTH WITH SEVEN. THERE'S BEEN SEVERAL MEETINGS, AND THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF ITERATION TO LEAD US TO THIS POINT. THIS IS JUST IT HASN'T BEEN MOVING FAST. THIS IS JUST [00:25:04] THE FIRST PART OF THE PAPERWORK PART. IN ORDER TO MOVE THE WHOLE SITUATION FORWARD. SO HOPEFULLY THAT HELPS, YOU KNOW, UNDERSTAND THAT THIS ISN'T JUST THE FIRST THING THAT WE'VE DONE WITH THIS. IT'S BEEN A COUNCIL FOR MANY, MANY MONTHS AND THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION, A LOT OF EXECUTIVE SESSIONS AND, AND THAT SORT OF THING. IN ORDER TO GET JUST TO THIS POINT, I WOULD SAY LONGER THAN MANY MONTHS, YEARS. I WANT TO ADD THAT I DO KNOW THAT THE HISTORIC SOCIETY HAS BEEN INVOLVED, AND THEY'VE KIND OF LIKE WASHED THEIR HANDS. SO. I WOULD LIKE THE HISTORIC SOCIETY TO BE MORE INVOLVED, BUT THERE'S NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT. I MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE. CHANGE ORDINANCE. IS THAT RIGHT? NOT JUST YET. MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH THE CONDITIONS THAT MISS ALICE. STIPULATED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE COUNCIL WITH THE STIPULATIONS OF SYSTEM MANAGER HOLLY, DEPUTY DEPUTY. SORRY, I'M JUST KIDDING. YEAH, THERE'S A LOT OF WORDS TO BEGIN WITH. SO. YEAH, I'VE GOT IT. THANK YOU. MOTION. IS THAT THE CONDITIONS? CONDITIONS. WHO WAS IT ON THE OKAY, I KEEP FORGETTING. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL TO ACCEPT THIS ITEM WITH THE STIPULATION OF THE CHANGES THAT WERE PRESENTED HERE IN THIS MEETING. I'LL SECOND, THERE'S A MOTION AND A SECOND, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE. HOLD A PUBLIC MEETING. CONSIDER AND [3. Hold a Public Hearing, consider, and act upon, a recommendation to City Council regarding the writing of an ordinance for a change in zoning from Commercial Corridor - Special Use Permit (CC-SUP) to Commercial Corridor - Special Use Permit (CC-SUP) to allow for new structure for vehicle car sales on 4.118 acres located near 2021 N State Highway 78 (ZC 2026-11). ] ACT UPON A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE WRITING OF AN ORDINANCE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR. SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR. SPECIAL USE PERMIT DC SUP TO ALLOW FOR NEW STRUCTURE FOR VEHICLE CAR SALES ON 4.118 ACRES. LOCATED NEAR 2021 NORTH STATE HIGHWAY 78, Z C. 2020 611 KEVIN. YES. OUR THIRD ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. THIS IS TECHNICALLY A SPECIAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT, SO THERE'S CURRENTLY AN AUTO REPAIR USE AT THE SITE LOCATED AT 2021 NORTH STATE HIGHWAY 78. THEY HAVE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR VEHICLE SALES, BUT IT'S IT'S ONLY ON AT THESE TEN SPACES THAT ARE THAT I'M HIGHLIGHTING OVER RIGHT NOW, THEY'RE PROPOSING TO DEVELOP A NEW BUILDING THAT'S DEDICATED FOR CAR SALES BEHIND THE AUTO REPAIR BUILDING. IN DOING THAT, THEY WOULD GET RID OF THAT CAR SALES ALLOWANCE THAT THEY CURRENTLY HAVE AND JUST HAVE IT IN THE BACK AREA. THIS WOULD THIS IS ALSO GOING TO BE THE REVIEW OF THE SITE PLAN. AND THEY'RE PROVIDING 68 PARKING SPACES WITH THREE BEING ADA ACCESSIBLE. AND THEY ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. REALLY, I GUESS THE QUESTION TODAY IS IF YOU THINK IT'S A COMPATIBLE USE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA, SINCE IT IS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, YOU DO HAVE RESIDENCES IN THE BACK AND THEN EVERYTHING AROUND IT IS OTHER THAN THAT IS COMMERCIAL. THEY DO HAVE A SCREENING WALL THAT'S ALREADY THERE. IT'S A SIX FOOT TALL MASONRY WALL. AND THEN THIS IS AN IMAGE OF THE ELEVATION OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING THEIR TREES. AND THEN THIS IS THE THE BUILDING ITSELF. SO WE DID MAIL 33 NOTICES AND RECEIVED FIVE IN OPPOSITION AND ONE IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST BY [00:30:08] THE APPLICANT. WITH THAT, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. AND ACTUALLY SO HERE ARE ACTUALLY THE THE NOTICES IF YOU WANT TO READ THEM. THANK YOU. SO WE DID GET THESE AFTER THE PACKET WAS POSTED. THAT'S WHY YOU'RE BARELY SEEING THEM NOW. COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE WE MOVE INTO THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? YES, YES, THE APPLICANT IS HERE. CAN THEY COME UP? I DON'T KNOW WHO IT IS. THEY MIGHT HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR YOU. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. BENJAMIN. SAM, 6008 MAPLE AVENUE, DALLAS, TEXAS. I WON'T KEEP YOU LONG. I WAS JUST WONDERING, IS IT GOING TO BE LIKE A KIND OF CARS? ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE. WHAT KIND OF CARS ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE CARS FOR SALE OR MORE USED? OR IS IT IT'S GOING TO BE A MIXTURE OF BOTH. OKAY. YEAH, LIKE A BIT ALL DIFFERENT BRANDS AND STUFF. YES. OKAY. HOW MANY CARS DO YOU THINK YOU'LL HAVE OUT THERE? WE'RE LOOKING AT ABOUT PROBABLY 40. OKAY. THAT'S ALL I GOT. ANYONE ELSE? NOTHING. WE'LL MOVE TO THE PUBLIC. SO HOW MANY CARS DO YOU HAVE THERE CURRENTLY THAT YOU'RE YOU HAVE A SMALL SALES LOT, RIGHT? CURRENTLY. RIGHT. THE ALLOWED TEN SPACES FOR PARKING FOR THOSE FOR SALES. BUT A LOT OF THE OPERATIONS ALSO ONLINE. AND SO SOMETIMES THEY WILL PROBABLY BRING CARS IN AS THEY'RE SOLD FOR PEOPLE TO COME AND PICK IT UP. RIGHT. ANYONE ELSE? OKAY, THEN WE'LL GO TO THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYONE HERE TONIGHT THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS SUBJECT? THIS TOPIC? IF NOT, THEN I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONERS. ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? MORE QUESTIONS? I WAS JUST WONDERING, SINCE IT'S A LOT, ARE THEY GOING TO PUT LIGHTS OVER THE CARS BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, IT'S ONLY A SIX FOOT WALL. YEAH. SO IF THEY WE HAVEN'T GOT A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FROM THEM YET. THIS IS JUST THE BASE. BUT IF THEY WERE THEN THEY WOULD HAVE TO MEET WITH WHAT THE ORDINANCE, YOU KNOW, TALKS ABOUT KEEPING THAT DOWN AT THE PROPERTY LINE. YOU KNOW THAT SORT OF DOWN FACING LIGHTS AND THAT SORT OF THING. SO WE'D WORK WITH THEM ON THAT, BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERNS WITH THE RESIDENTS TO THE TO THE SOUTH. DEFINITELY. RIGHT. I WAS THINKING THAT MIGHT BE ONE OF THE REASONS THEY WERE AGAINST IT. SURE. ANYONE ELSE? THEN I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. YEAH. I'M SORRY I MISSED THAT. YEAH. OKAY, THEN WE NEED A MOTION. I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. I'LL. MAKE A MOTION. I FOR ME, IT IT'S NOT REALLY. I DON'T THINK THAT'S THE BEST PLACE FOR SOMETHING LIKE THIS, ESPECIALLY BACK THERE. AND. AS CLOSE AS TO RESIDENTIAL AND WHAT COMMISSIONER CHANDLER BROUGHT UP WITH THE LIGHTING, I. IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I THINK I WOULD GET BEHIND. SO I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY ELSE HAS ANYTHING TO SAY, BUT IF NOT, I CAN MAKE A. AT SOME POINT DOWN THERE. YEAH. NO, I MEAN, I MEAN, I'M, I THINK IT WAS IT WAS INTERESTING ALL THE YOU KNOW, I WISH THEY WOULD HAVE COME TO TALK TONIGHT, BUT THAT ALL THE RESIDENTS THAT WERE LIVING ON THAT BACK ROW ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS. AND SO IT'S I MEAN, IT'S A SIX FOOT FENCE. ARE THEY GOING TO MAKE A LARGER FENCE THAN THE SIX FOOT. ARE THEY GOING TO LEAVE IT AT THE SIX FOOT OR WHAT IS THAT KIND OF WHAT IS THE SCREENING? IS IT JUST TO KEEP IT THE SAME? THE THE WALL. IT'S SIX FEET. YEAH. I'M THAT'S WHAT WAS ALREADY IN PLACE. I'M WONDERING IF IT WAS [00:35:06] DONE BY THE SUBDIVISION AND NOT BY THE COMMERCIAL. SO IT'S OWNED BY THE RESIDENTIAL. NOT NOT THE COMMERCIAL. YEAH. BECAUSE PROBABLY THE ALLEYWAY. SO THAT'S PROBABLY THE. RIGHT. YEAH. I MEAN WE MENTIONED THE LIGHTING. THERE COULD BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS ON LIGHTING IF IT HELPS WITHIN THESE CONDITIONS TOO, THAT ARE ABOVE AND BEYOND WHAT WE REQUIRE IN OUR ZONING ORDINANCE TO. BUT THAT DEPENDS ON I MEAN, THAT'S THE QUESTION THAT IF THERE'S RESTRICTIONS ON LIGHTING, THEN I WORRY ABOUT IS IT IS THAT EVEN APPROPRIATE? YOU KNOW, I MEAN, IF WE'RE GONNA HAVE IF YOU'RE GOING TO RESTRICT THE LIGHTING, IT CAN'T BE LIT WELL LIT, THEN IT'S GOING TO BE AN EASY PLACE FOR SOMEONE TO, TO, TO GO AND, AND EITHER STEAL A CAR BURGLARIZE OR SOMETHING. AND THAT'S GOING TO MAKE THE LIGHTING AS A DETERRENT. YEAH, I CAN SEE THAT TOO, RIGHT? I MEAN, CAN WE ASK THEM TO GIVE US MORE INFORMATION WITH THE LIGHTING AND KIND OF ALL THAT? YEAH. AND ONE THING I GUESS I WOULD WANT TO MENTION TOO IS THE PROPERTY IS COMMERCIAL. SO EVENTUALLY YOU'RE GOING TO SEE SOMETHING BACK THERE. IT'S JUST DEPENDS ON IF THIS IS WHAT YOU WANT TO SEE. SO. OKAY, I'LL GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION TO. RECOMMEND DISAPPROVAL OF THE CHANGE IN ZONING. YEP. THAT'S FINE. OKAY. THERE'S BEEN A MOTION TO NOT RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS ITEM. IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION. MOTION AND SECONDED TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO NOT ACCEPT THE REQUEST FOR ZONING CHANGE, PLEASE VOTE. YEP. NO. THE MOTION PASSED. NOT RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. ITEM NUMBER FOUR, HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND [4. Consider, and act upon, a recommendation to City Council regarding the writing of an ordinance for a change in zoning from Planned Development 2023-18 to Planned Development - Commercial Corridor (PD-CC) on 10.485 acres generally located on the southeast corner of State Highway 78 and Kreymer Lane (ZC 2026-12).] CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE WRITING OF AN ORDINANCE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM PLAN DEVELOPMENT 2020 318 TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR PD C C ON 10.485 ACRES. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 78 AND KRAMER LANE, DC 2026. 12 KEVIN. YES, SIR. LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS A REQUEST FOR PLAN DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF STATE HIGHWAY 78 AND KRAMER LANE. SO THEIR CURRENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT. IT ALLOWS FOR THREE DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANTS ON LOTS ONE, TWO AND FOUR. AND THEY'RE NEEDING THIS PLAN DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR ONE ADDITIONAL DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANT. AND THEN THEY ALSO HAD CHANGES ON THE BACK LOTS WHERE TWO OF THE LOTS WERE ARE GOING TO BE COMBINED TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HEALTH CLUB. SO THINK LIKE A COMMERCIAL GYM WOULD BE BACK THERE. THIS IS CONCEPTUAL. SO YOU ARE STILL GOING TO SEE THE SITE PLANS COME IN. IT'S THIS IS MORE LIKE THEM GETTING THEIR ALLOWANCES FOR THE USES. AND THEN WE'LL SEE THE PLATS AND THE SITE PLANS LATER ON. WE DID MAIL NOTICES TO 27 PROPERTY OWNERS. WE DID RECEIVE ONE IN OPPOSITION FROM A PROPERTY OWNER ON KRAMER LANE. YOU CAN SEE WHERE MY THE X MARK IS RIGHT HERE. AND I DID JUST SHOW THIS ONE ON THE DISPLAY SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT THEY SAID. SO. COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE WE GO INTO THE. WHICH ONE IS THE ADDITIONAL ONE? OKAY, SO I'M ASSUMING A LOT. FIVE OH, IT'S THIS ONE. LOT THREE. RIGHT HERE. OH YEAH. YEAH. SO TO BE CLEAR, THERE'S TWO CHANGES. TWO MAJOR CHANGES FOR A REQUEST IS THAT LOT THREE ALSO BE ALLOWED TO BE A DRIVE THROUGH BECAUSE ORIGINALLY THERE WAS ONLY THREE DRIVE THRUS. AND THEY WANT TO DO A FOURTH. AND THEN ALSO THE BACKS AREA OF THIS WAS SHOWN AS ALL MEDICAL OFFICE. AND THERE WAS FOUR LOTS. AND NOW THEY WANT TO GO DOWN TO THREE. AND ONE OF THOSE LOTS WOULD TURN INTO A POTENTIAL HEALTH CLUB USE. DOES IT. I GUESS I'M JUST THINKING [00:40:14] OF THE HEALTH. I MEAN IS THERE PARKING. LOOKS LIKE IS THERE AMPLE PARKING FOR ALL THAT THE REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE NEEDED FOR THAT? YES. THEIR PARKING RATIOS MATCH WHAT WE REQUIRE FOR THE ZONING ORDINANCE. YEAH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NOW WE'LL MOVE TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM NUMBER FOUR OF THE AGENDA FOR TONIGHT. I WAS GIVEN ONE COMMENT REQUEST FROM MARIE RUTAN. PLEASE COME UP. I DON'T KNOW Y'ALL'S LOT ONE, TWO, THREE THAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT. WHERE WOULD YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS? MARIE RUTAN I'M AT 340 KELLY COURT THANK YOU. HERE IN WILEY I I'M ONE OF THE LUCKY ONES. I ONLY HAVE ABOUT 50FT OF THAT UP THERE. SO I CONSIDER MYSELF LUCKY. OKAY. I MEAN, I, I'M GLAD YOU'RE DEVELOPING IT, BUT I DO HAVE SOME CONCERNS. I WANT TO KNOW IF YOU'RE GOING TO PUT A FENCE, HOW TALL AND WHO'S GOING TO MAINTAIN THE SOUTH SIDE OF THAT FENCE, BECAUSE I KNOW THE FENCE CAN'T SET ON THE PROPERTY LINE. OKAY, SO RIGHT NOW I PROBABLY MOW HERE TO THAT WALL JUST TO KEEP THE WEEDS OFF OF ME. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? BECAUSE IF YOU WAIT TOO LONG. OH, AND I WANT IT MOWED BECAUSE IF YOU WAIT TOO LONG IN THE COOL WEATHER STARTS. I GET INFESTED IN RATS. AND I KNOW THAT WILEY HAS AN 18 INCH LIMIT ON WEEDS. I'M FIVE THREE. THE WEEDS ARE UP TO HERE, SO I THINK THAT'S A LITTLE BIT HIGHER THAN 18IN. I MEAN, THAT'S THAT'S PROBABLY IMMATERIAL TO Y'ALL, BUT IT'S MAJOR TO ME. I WILL TALK TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT FOLKS SO THAT THEY CAN SEND A NOTICE AND WE'LL GET IT. WE'LL GET IT TAKEN CARE OF. I WOULD LOVE TO GET IT MODE. I MEAN, I MOW, LIKE I SAID, KEEP THE WEEDS OFF OF ME. WE DOCTOR THE ANTHILLS, ME AND THE WHOLE HAGER, THAT BUILDING THAT'S DIRECTLY BEHIND ME, HE MOWS THE WEST SIDE OF HIS FENCE TO KEEP THE WEEDS OFF OF HIM. AND THEN I MOWED THE NORTH SIDE. I GUESS THAT'S IT. SO I'M NOT GOING TO FUSS WITH YOU ON YOUR ZONING UNLESS YOU PUT. UNLESS YOU LET ME UP LIKE A CHRISTMAS TREE LIKE WALMART DID, AND THEN I'LL FUSS AT YOU. YOU GOT TO KEEP THOSE LIGHTS DOWN BECAUSE MY THEORY IS IF THEY'RE AFRAID OF THE DARK, THEY OUGHT TO STAY IN TOWN. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR COMING TONIGHT. THANK YOU FOR COMING TONIGHT AND PARTICIPATING IN THIS. ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS SUBJECT? GOOD EVENING. COMMISSION CLAY CHRISTY CLAYMORE ENGINEERING, 3231 HARWOOD AVENUE WHERE THE APPLICANT ON THIS ITEM HERE REPRESENTATIVE. REPRESENTATIVE. FIRST OFF, WE'RE OBVIOUSLY JUST THE REPRESENTATIVE HERE, BUT I KNOW THAT YOU ALSO MAKE A CALL. I'LL MAKE A CALL AS SOON AS I LEAVE HERE TO TRY TO TAKE CARE OF HER CONCERNS ON THAT, I WASN'T AWARE OF IT, BUT I WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE RIGHT PEOPLE FIND OUT ABOUT IT AND WORK TO GET THAT RESOLVED, BECAUSE THAT SHOULDN'T BE SOMETHING THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE TO BE WORRIED ABOUT BEHIND YOUR HOUSE. WE'RE HERE. I MEAN, STAFF, AS ALWAYS, KEVIN DID A GREAT JOB PRESENTING WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR HERE TODAY. WE'VE JUST RAN INTO SOME CHALLENGES MARKETING THAT THAT FRONT LOT. THERE'S A NORTH TEXAS MUNICIPAL WATER EASEMENT THAT WE HAVE TO WORK AROUND. AND THE, THE LARGER BUILDINGS AND THE FREESTANDING BUILDINGS THAT WE HAVE, HAVE HAD A REALLY HARD TIME BEING ABLE TO SITUATE AROUND THAT EASEMENT. THAT'S BEEN TOUGH. AND SO THAT'S KIND OF THE THE CRUX OF US TRYING TO BE HERE. AND THEN AS FOR THE, FOR THE GYM THAT WAS MENTIONED AT THE BACK, WE ARE TRYING TO CONSOLIDATE THOSE AND, AND PUT THAT IN THERE. I KNOW THERE WAS SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT FENCING AND MAKE SURE THE FENCING AND THE LIGHTING IS THERE. OBVIOUSLY WE'LL COME BACK WITH [00:45:03] YOU GUYS IF WE ARE SO FORTUNATE TO BE APPROVED THERE, THE LIGHTING WOULD COME BACK AND EVERYTHING ELSE WITH A SITE PLAN PROCESS AND ENSURE THAT THAT LIGHTING WOULD BE IN COMPLIANCE TO KEEP IT OFF THE NEIGHBORS. SO WITH THAT, IF THERE'S ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER. QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I JUST WANT TO ADD, I THINK IT'S A GREAT THING WHEN PEOPLE COME AND BRING COMMENTS FOR THINGS THAT ARE BEING PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, SOMETIMES WE DON'T ALWAYS HEAR WHAT'S GOING ON, BUT WE LIKE TO HEAR FROM FROM THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY. THANK YOU. ANYONE UP HERE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? YEAH. THEREFORE ANYONE ELSE? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE ELSE? I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I RECOMMEND I MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR THE CHANGING ZONING. OKAY. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE TO. RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ITEM NUMBER FOUR. AND MOTION HAS NOW BEEN SECONDED. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. AND THE MOTION PASSES. YEAH. SO THIS COMING THIS MONTH, WE'VE GOT FIVE TUESDAYS. SO IT'LL BE THREE WEEKS. SO GET A WEEK OFF. BUT YES, WE'LL HAVE A I THINK IT'S THE SIXTH OF 6TH OF OCTOBER IF I'M DOING MY MATH. RIGHT. SO. OKAY, IF THERE'S ANY MORE BUSINESS FOR THE COUNCIL COMMISSION, I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. A MOTION TO ADJOURN. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. BEEN MOVED AND SECONDED. WE ADJOURN THE MEETING. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. YOU CAN STAY HERE. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.