Jun 02, 2026 Planning and Zoning

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:10]

CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING FOR JUNE 2ND, 2006. AND TO START IT OFF WITH, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE COMMISSIONER CHANDLER DO THE PRAYER AND COMMISSIONER SCRUGGS TO DO THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. WE PRAY, OUR DEAR FATHER, BRINGING US TOGETHER TODAY, AND GIVE US THE WISDOM AND THE UNDERSTANDING TO MAKE THE RIGHT DECISIONS, LORD, AND BE OVER THIS COMMITTEE AS WE DO BIDDING FOR THE CITY AND MAKE THE RIGHT DECISIONS. LORD, IN JESUS NAME WE PRAY. AMEN. AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. OKAY, NEXT ITEM IS COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS. THE. ANYONE THAT HAS ANY THINGS THEY WOULD LIKE TO BRING UP THAT'S NOT CURRENTLY ON THE AGENDA. NO? OKAY, THEN I WILL. CLOSE COMMENTS CLOSED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA. ARE ANY OF THE

[CONSENT AGENDA ]

THERE WE GO. OKAY. NOW ON TO THE REGULAR AGENDA. OH, SORRY ABOUT THAT. THERE WE GO. AND THAT PASSES FOUR VOTES. WE HAVE A QUORUM ON TO THE REGULAR AGENDA. I READ THAT FIRST.

[1. Consider, and act upon, a site plan amendment for W.I.S.D. CTE and AG Center, being on Lot 1, Block A of Wylie I.S.D. CTE & AG Center, for a school facility use on 37.818 acres. Property generally located at 1301 Hensley Lane. ]

GOOD EVENING. OUR FIRST ITEM ON THE REGULAR AGENDA IS A SITE PLAN REQUEST BY WYLIE ISD. WHAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR ARE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING AG CENTER THAT'S LOCATED AT 1301 HENSLEY LANE. SO THESE ARE THE CURRENT CONDITIONS OF THE BUILDING GENERALLY WHERE MY MOUSE IS. AND WHAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR IS FOR AN EXPANSION OF THE ACTUAL AG CENTER BY ADDING A NEW SHOW AREA, NEW CATTLE TURNOUT, AND A NEW PIG BORN. IN ADDITION TO THIS, THEY ARE ALSO BUILDING A NEW CTE BUILDING WITH A NEW GREENHOUSE. AND FOR ACCESS, THEY ARE PROVIDING A FIRE LANE THAT'S GOING TO LOOP AROUND ALL OF THE STRUCTURES. WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT, THEY WERE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A SECONDARY POINT OF ACCESS AS WELL, SINCE THE SITE CURRENTLY ONLY HAD ONE. AND FOR THAT THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO. GET A SHARED ACCESS EASEMENT OR A MUTUAL ACCESS EASEMENT, CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT TO ON THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH. WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT, THEY'RE PROVIDING 130 PARKING SPACES, AND TEN OF THEM ARE ADA ACCESSIBLE. THE SITE PLAN DIDN'T PROVIDE ANY ON SITE DETENTION. SO WITH THE CIVIL PLANS, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PROVE THAT THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO PROVIDE IT OR THAT IT'S NOT

[00:05:03]

ITEM HAS PASSED. ITEM NUMBER TWO ON THE CONSENT ON THE REGULAR AGENDA. EXCUSE ME. GET BACK UP OR I CAN SEE WHAT I WANT TO SEE. OKAY. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER. AND

[2. Hold a Public Hearing to consider, and act upon a recommendation to City Council regarding a change of zoning from Neighborhood Services (NS) to Neighborhood Services - Special Use Permit (NS-SUP), to allow for convenience store and motor vehicle fueling station use on 3.53 acres generally located on the northeast corner of Country Club and Park Blvd. (ZC2026-06) ]

OUR SECOND ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS A IT'S A PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST FOR A ZONING CASE FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A FUELING STATION AND A CONVENIENCE STORE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB ROAD AND PARK BOULEVARD. THE STRUCTURE MEASURES APPROXIMATELY 5000FT■!S. WITH THIS PROPOSAL, THEY'RE ALSO SHOWING THE POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF TWO ADDITIONAL RETAIL BUILDINGS. BUT THAT'S NOT PART OF THIS SCOPE, NECESSARILY. AND THEN KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS DESIGN IS ALSO CONCEPTUAL, SO THEY WILL HAVE TO COME BACK FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW LATER ON IF THIS IS APPROVED. WITH THIS REQUEST.

THEY DID. THEY ARE REQUESTING A WAIVER TO THE 300 FOOT DISTANCE REQUIREMENT FROM A SCHOOL FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOL AND SMOKING PRODUCTS, WITH THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WE HAVE ADDED THOSE CONDITIONS, BUT THERE ARE ALSO LIMITATIONS TO THE TYPE OF SMOKING PRODUCTS THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED. ESSENTIALLY, IT'S CIGARETTES AND CIGARS ONLY. THEY CAN'T HAVE VAPING OR CBD TYPE PRODUCTS. AND THEN IT'S ALSO LIMITED TO 100FT■!S OF SPAE FOR THE SMOKING PRODUCTS, AND THEN FOR REFERENCE, I ALSO WANTED TO SHOW BY HOW MUCH THE THE DISTANCE REQUIREMENT ISN'T BEING MET BECAUSE THE PROPERTY, THE WAY TBC MEASURES THE THE REQUIREMENT IS PROPERTY LINE OF PROPERTY LINE. THE 300FT. THEY'RE AT 299.71FT. SO THEY ALMOST MADE IT, BUT THEY DIDN'T, WHICH IS WHAT'S REQUIRING THIS WAIVER. THIS REQUEST IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE THAT WAS SUBMITTED LAST YEAR. SINCE IT DOESN'T HAVE THE DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANT COMPONENT, THE ONE THEY HAD LAST YEAR DID HAVE A DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANT, WHICH WOULD HAVE ALSO NEEDED AN S, U, P, AND THEY ARE PROPOSING FOR THE SITE TO BE ACCESSED THROUGH

[00:10:01]

IN GENERAL, THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE PLAN, WITH IT BEING IN THE LOCAL COMMERCIAL SECTOR. AND WITH THAT, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

WE ALSO MADE SURE TO STATE IN THE REPORT THAT IT'S ONLY ONE FUELING STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE THAT THEY'RE ALLOWED, RIGHT, BECAUSE THE SITE IS PRETTY BIG, RIGHT? SO WE MADE SURE THAT IT'S ONLY BUILDING ONE ON THE SITE THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED TO HAVE THIS TYPE OF USE. THE REST OF THE BUILDINGS WOULD HAVE TO HAVE USES THAT USES THAT ARE ALREADY ALLOWED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES DISTRICT. SINCE THAT'S THE CURRENT ZONING AND THIS.

OKAY. THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME, WE'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THIS TIME, ARE THERE ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS? I HAVE SEVERAL SHEETS THAT HAVE BEEN PRESENTED. THOSE AREN'T THE SAME AS THE ONES THAT WE GET FOR PEOPLE THAT ARE SHOWED UP, THAT HAVE SHOWN UP.

OKAY, SO RELATED TO THAT, AND WE SENT OUT 15 AND WE HAVE NINE, BUT ONLY FOUR OF THEM. OH, YOU SHOULD BE ON ON THE SPEAKER. I'M NOT. HE ISN'T. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT SORRY. WE ONLY HAD TWO THAT WERE ON THE PACKET THAT WERE SENT TO US WASN'T IT. YEAH. BECAUSE WE HAVE TO PUT THE PACKET OUT. YOU KNOW, STATE LAW SAYS WE HAVE TO PUT IT OUT EARLY. YEAH. SO THERE WAS ONLY TWO IN THE PACKET AND THEN THE REST OF THEM ARE BEING PASSED OUT RIGHT NOW. OKAY. IS JULIANNE JOHN HERE? WE HAVE NO NO THERE'S NO SUBMITTED. THOSE ARE FOR WHAT THOSE ARE. YEAH.

OKAY. WE HAVE NO ONE SPEAKING. NO ONE YET. OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? IF YOU DO, YOU NEED TO COME UP AND FILL OUT A, A FORM SO WE CAN HAVE IT ON RECORD.

OKAY. THERE ARE NO MORE. COMMENTS. THEN WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND WE'LL GO ON TO THE DISCUSSION WITHIN THE COMMISSION. COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU HAVE ANY. QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF AT THIS TIME OR THE APPLICANT? THE APPLICANT WITH US TONIGHT. OKAY. THANK YOU. SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE I I'M LOOKING AT THIS RIGHT. WE ARE TALKING COUNTRY CLUB AND PARK BOULEVARD RIGHT NEXT TO DOD. CORRECT. WE'RE NOT ON THE CORNER. YEAH, NOT RIGHT NEXT TO DOD. THERE'S THE PARK. YEAH, THE DOD, THE PARK. THIS IS ON THE HARD CORNER. THEN YOU'VE GOT THE DAYCARE AND THE PARK AND THEN THE SCHOOL ITSELF. SO. GODDARD. YEAH. WHICH IS THAT SCHOOL? YES. THEN THE PARK ITSELF. AND JUST A LITTLE BIT FURTHER DOWN FROM THAT LONG ENTIRE STRIP, RIGHT? YES, SIR. I'M JUST ON VISUAL. YEAH. RIGHT. THERE YOU GO. YEAH. SO I WANT TO I'D LIKE TO BRING THOSE COMMISSIONERS UP TO DATE WHO HAVEN'T BEEN AROUND HERE. THIS WAS ORIGINALLY PRESENTED TO US ON JUNE 17TH OF 2025. YEAH. I WAS HERE FOR THAT ONE FOR THAT ONE YEAR. FOR THAT ONE TOO. OKAY. IT WAS PASSED 3 TO 2. THEN IT WENT ON TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 8TH, WHICH IT WAS TABLED AND WAS BROUGHT BACK UP AT THE AUGUST 26TH, 2025

[00:15:05]

MAKE A MOTION EITHER ACCEPT OR DENY. I MAKE A MOTION TO DENY AS IS. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE TO DENY THE REQUEST FROM THE APPLICANT. IS THERE A SECOND I SECOND IT? THERE IS A MOTION AND A SECOND TO DENY THE APPLICATION. PLEASE VOTE. YOU'RE VOTING ON WHETHER TO TO DENY THE APPLICATION, NOT.

THE MOTION PASSES. THE APPLICANT. THE APPLICATION IS DENIED.

RECOMMENDED FOR DENIAL. NOT RECOMMENDED. I WAS RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL NOT FOR APPROVAL. OKAY, ON TO ITEM NUMBER THREE. BACK UP HERE. ONE OF THESE DAYS I'LL LEARN HOW TO

[3. Hold a Public Hearing to consider, and act upon a recommendation to City Council regarding a change of zoning from Commercial Corridor (CC) to Commercial Corridor - Special Use Permit (CC-SUP), to allow for a minor auto repair use on 1.275 acres located at 7940 E Parker Road. (ZC2026-05) ]

IS THERE ANY. THIRD ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7940 EAST PARKER ROAD. THE LAND IS CURRENTLY ZONED COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, BUT THEY NEED THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR AUTOMOBILE REPAIR FOR AN AUTOMOBILE REPAIR SHOP. THIS IS THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN AS WELL, SINCE THEY ARE GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SITE PLAN LATER ON WITH THIS REQUEST. THEY ARE ALSO ASKING TO BE ALLOWED TO HAVE THE LOADING DOORS FACE THE RIGHT OF WAY. PARKER ROAD. THEY HAVE ADDED A NOTE AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SCREENING TO SHIELD THE THE GARAGE DOORS. SO AND THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S GOING TO BE LIKE THAT WITH THE SITE PLAN THAT'S SUBMITTED LATER ON. IF THIS PASSES, THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT ALSO HAS A CONDITION WHICH ALLOWS FOR THE EXISTING BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY AT THE VERY BACK TO TO REMAIN PENDING APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND FIRE MARSHAL ON ITS CONDITION AND SAFETY CODE.

THEY DON'T PLAN ON DRIVING TO THE BUILDING. THEY'RE JUST GOING TO USE IT FOR STORAGE, AND THEY PRETTY MUCH JUST SAW IT AS AN ASSET FOR THE SITE, AND THEY DIDN'T WANT TO KNOCK IT DOWN. EXCUSE ME. THE PROPOSAL DOES HAVE A FIRE LANE THAT LOOPS AROUND THE WHOLE BUILDING WITH PARKING. AND IN GENERAL, THIS CONCEPTUAL PLAN WOULD PASS IF IT WAS A SITE PLAN, THEY JUST DIDN'T HAVE THE REQUIRED PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND ELEVATIONS AS WELL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. SO IT'S A GOOD LOOK AT WHAT IT WILL BE. WE DID MAIL TEN

[00:20:03]

THE LAND ITSELF IS ALREADY ZONED COMMERCIAL, EVEN THOUGH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN HAS THIS AREA AS LOW DENSITY. BEFORE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS ADOPTED, THE NEW ONE THAT WE HAVE, IT DID COMPLY WITH THE GENERAL URBAN SECTOR. IT'S JUST BE IT WAS JUST LISTED THE WAY IT IS BECAUSE THE AREA IS ADJACENT TO IT ARE STILL AG SO IT WAS ALL CLASSIFIED AS LOW LOW DENSITY SECTOR, RIGHT. SO. TECHNICALLY IT'S NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT COMP PLAN, BUT IT WAS TO THE PREVIOUS ONE. SO THAT'S THAT'S WHAT IT IS. BUT WE DID, WE DID LOOK AT THE RESIDENTIAL LIKE ADJACENCY OF THE STRUCTURE AND PRETTY MUCH WHERE THEY'RE PLACING THE BUILDING IS FAR AWAY FROM THE SUBDIVISIONS TO THE SOUTH. THAT'S DOWN THERE BECAUSE THE BUILDING IS GOING TO BE UP HERE, RIGHT? SO THE TWO PLACES ON EITHER SIDE ARE RESIDENTS. YES. BUT THE THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THIS SITE OWNS THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST.

IT'S PROBABLY HE OWNS THAT ONE. YES. BUT IT'S STILL A RESIDENCE. YOU'RE CORRECT ABOUT THAT. THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER ON THE EAST HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT IT OR THEY. NO, WE DIDN'T GET ANY RESPONSES BACK. YEAH. I WAS WANTING TO ASK HIM A QUESTION, BUT SINCE THEY'RE HERE, NOT HERE. AND THEN THE COMMENT I HAVE IS WE WOULD NOW HAVE A, A REPAIR SHOP FOR EUROPEAN STYLE CARS. YEAH. I KNOW WHEN WE HAD A LEXUS, WE HAD TO GO ALL THE WAY INTO WEST PLANO TO GET IT FIXED. YEAH. NOT A LEXUS. YEAH. LEXUS. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? NOT FROM ME. WE SENT OUT TEN NO RESPONSES. RIGHT. YEAH. WE DIDN'T GET ANY RESPONSES BACK. PUBLIC HEARING. YEP. IF NOT, WE'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE. HERE TONIGHT THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON IT? IF NOT, THEN I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONERS. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. IS THERE A SECOND? I SECOND THE MOTION. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE AND A SECOND. PLEASE VOTE. AND THE MOTION PASSES 4 TO 0. ITEM NUMBER FOUR. AND. HOLD A PUBLIC

[4. Hold a Public Hearing to consider, and act upon, a recommendation to City Council amending Zoning Ordinance (2023-23), Article 5, Sections 5.1 Land Use Charts, 5.2 Listed Uses, and Article 7 General Development Regulations, as they relate to existing and new proposed listed uses. ( ZC 2026-04)]

[00:25:02]

AND WE MADE TEXAS LAW REQUIREMENTS CHANGES FOR THE HOME OCCUPATION PROVISIONS. AND LASTLY, THIS WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO REQUIRE A SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES TO HAVE SUPS REGARDLESS IF THEY'RE IN HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, JUST IN CASE THAT LAND IS EVER SOLD. SO WITH THIS REQUEST, IT DIDN'T REQUIRE A NOTIFICATION LIKE TO CITIZENS LIKE THROUGH THE MAP, BUT WE DID HAVE TO POST IT IN THE NEWSPAPER. SO WITH THAT, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. HAS THERE BEEN ANY FEEDBACK SINCE IT'S BEEN POSTED INTO THE PAPER? NO, NO TO THE CITY COUNCIL. AND YEAH, REALLY OUR PURPOSE FOR DOING THIS WAS JUST TO KIND OF UPDATE OUR ORDINANCE, SINCE IT'S BASED ON THE 2003 ORDINANCE THAT WE HAVE, AND IT ADDS NEW USES THAT WE SEE A LOT OF PEOPLE WANT THEIR DEVELOPERS, BUT IT ALSO GIVES THE CITY CONTROL BY LIMITING THEM THROUGH SPECIAL USE PERMITS. YEAH. CAN WE MAKE THE DATA CENTER 10,000FT■!S LIKE WE DID THE ONE PLACE? YEAH. I MEAN, THAT'S ACTUALLY THAT WAS APPROVED AT 34,000. YEAH. THERE WAS ONLY ONE COUNCIL MEMBER THAT WANTED IT AT TEN. WELL, I SHOULDN'T SAY IT THAT WAY, BUT THERE WAS A COUNCIL MEMBER THAT WANTED IT AT TEN AND EVERYBODY ELSE WAS OKAY WITH THE LARGER SIZE. YEAH. AND WE JUST HAVE IT WRITTEN IN A WAY WHERE THE CUMULATIVE AREA, IF IT'S OVER 25,000, THAT'S WHEN IT WOULD TRIGGER THE S P. SO IF THEY HAD MULTIPLE 10,000 BUILDINGS, IT WOULD BE THE BIG, THE BIG TAKEAWAY FROM THAT PART OF IT, BECAUSE I KNOW THAT'S WHAT, YOU KNOW, SOME PEOPLE, A LOT OF FOLKS WERE WORRIED ABOUT, WAS THAT WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO LIMIT IT TO IS NORMAL USE OF UTILITIES. YES. THAT'S WHAT I WANT. YEAH. IF THEY HAVE TO PUT A SUBSTATION IN OR, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A WHOLE OTHER WATER ISSUE OR ALL THAT, THEN THAT'S GOING TO PRETTY MUCH KIND OF GO OUT THE WINDOW, YOU KNOW, OR IT'S GOING TO TAKE A WHOLE LIKE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AS OPPOSED TO JUST A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SO THAT HELPS, YOU KNOW, JUST KEEP IT TO BASICALLY WHAT WOULD BE A GLORIFIED SERVER ROOM AS OPPOSED TO AN HONEST TO GOD TRUE DATA CENTER. YEAH. YOU KNOW.

I REMEMBER THE DISCUSSION ON FOUR B. ANYONE ELSE? QUESTIONS, COMMENTS? AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. NOPE. YOU NEED A PUBLIC HEARING FIRST, SIR. EXCUSE ME. YEAH. OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC HERE WISHES TO GET UP AND MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT THIS ITEM? IF NOT, THEN I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. NOW, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS? AND I WILL ACCEPT A MOTION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED. WE HAVE A SECOND. I'LL. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES. AND FOUR ZERO MOTION CARRIES. ANY COMMENTS? WE DON'T KNOW. WE'LL LET YOU KNOW PRETTY QUICK WHETHER WE'RE GONNA HAVE

[00:30:07]

BUT I'LL LET YOU KNOW AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. PROBABLY BY THE END OF THIS WEEK I WOULD THINK.

YEAH. OKAY. APPRECIATE IT. OKAY. I WILL ACCEPT THE MOTION TO ADJOURN. MOTION TO ADJOURN.

SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. PLEASE VOTE. PASSES FOUR

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.