Mar 10, 2026 City Council

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:11]

LIKE TO CALL TO ORDER THE MARCH 10TH, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS AT THE WYLIE MUNICIPAL CENTER. THE TIME IS 6:25 P.M. WE DO ASK IF YOU ARE HERE THIS EVENING AND YOU HAVE A CELL PHONE WITH YOU. IF YOU WILL, PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT IT IS EITHER SET TO VIBRATE OR TURNED OFF SO AS NOT TO DISTURB PROCEEDINGS. IF YOU DO GET A CALL WHICH YOU NEED TO TAKE, WE ASK THAT YOU WOULD STEP OUT TO OUR ATRIUM. MADAM CITY SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE TAKE ROLL AT THIS TIME? YES, MAYOR. MAYOR MATTHEW PORTER, PRESENT. COUNCILMAN DAVID R DUKE, PRESENT. COUNCILMAN DAVE STRANG, PRESENT. COUNCILMAN TODD PICKENS, COUNCILMAN SCOTT WILLIAMS. COUNCILMAN SID HOOVER, PRESENT. MAYOR PRO TEM GINA MILICI PRESENT. WE HAVE A QUORUM, MAYOR. THANK YOU, MISS STORM. AT THIS TIME, IF YOU WOULD, PLEASE STAND FOR THE INVOCATION, WHICH I WILL LEAD, FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE LED BY OUR MAYOR PRO TEM. DEAR LORD, WE COME BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING. WE THANK YOU FOR THE MANY BLESSINGS THAT YOU HAVE BESTOWED UPON ALL OF US HERE. LORD, WE THANK YOU FOR THIS AMAZING CITY, STATE, AND COUNTRY IN WHICH WE RESIDE, AND WE THANK YOU FOR THE ABILITY TO HAVE THE FREEDOMS THAT WE DO WITH THOSE FREEDOMS. COME SACRIFICE, LORD. AND WE PRAY THIS EVENING FOR THOSE WHO PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE FOR US. WE PRAY FOR OUR FIRST RESPONDERS. WE PRAY THAT YOU WOULD PROTECT THEM AS THEY SERVE US ON A DAILY BASIS. LORD, WE PRAY FOR THOSE WHO ARE EMBROILED IN CONFLICT OVERSEAS. LORD, WE ASK THAT YOU WOULD PROTECT THEM AS WELL. BRING THEM HOME SAFELY TO THEIR FAMILIES AND TO THOSE THAT HAVE BEEN LOST. WE EXPRESS OUR DEEPEST CONDOLENCES AND PRAY THAT YOU WOULD PUT A HAND OF PEACE UPON THAT FAMILY THAT HAS SUFFERED THAT LOSS ON OUR BEHALF IN ORDER TO KEEP US FREE. LORD, WE ASK THAT YOU WOULD GRANT WISDOM TO THIS COUNCIL THAT HAS BEEN ELECTED BY THE CITIZENS OF THIS CITY. LET US SERVE THEM AND DO WHAT IS RIGHT FOR THE CITY MOVING FORWARD. WE ASK THESE THINGS IN YOUR SON'S NAME. AMEN. ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

PLEASE BE SEATED. THIS EVENING, WITH NO PRESENTATIONS OR RECOGNITIONS, WE WILL MOVE

[COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS]

WE HAVE MISS ALEXIS TAP WHO IS HERE. AND I BELIEVE YOU WERE SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE WILEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY. IT SAYS SO YOU WILL HAVE UP TO SIX MINUTES IN WHICH TO ADDRESS COUNCIL IF YOU WILL PLACE, IF YOU'LL HIT THE SPEAKER BUTTON THERE FOR US, IF YOU HAVE ANY DOCUMENTATION, I WOULD ASK YOU TO LEAVE IT WITH OUR CITY SECRETARY. SHE CAN PROVIDE IT TO THE COUNCIL AS A WHOLE. OKAY. THE SPEAKING HEAD LOOKING THING. THAT THING. THERE YOU GO. SO IF YOU'LL START WITH YOUR NAME AND THE ORGANIZATION YOU'RE REPRESENTING FOR THE RECORD, AND THEN YOU'LL HAVE SIX MINUTES IN WHICH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. OKAY. I THINK SHE HAS A QUESTION FOR YOU. SURE. YOU MAY IF I CAN, I WILL. YEAH. IT'S NOTHING ABOUT GO AHEAD, APPROACH HIM. YES. OH THAT'S NO THAT'S PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE. THAT'S PERFECTLY FINE. HI. I'M ALEXIS TAP WITH THE WILEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF THE SOCIETY. AND I LIVE AT 3713 CAREY LANE 75 098. THE WILEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY CONTINUES TO FULFILL OUR MISSION STATEMENT.

[00:05:07]

IT'S AT THE HOUSEWRIGHT HOUSE, WHICH WILL BE A RECORDED TEXAS HISTORIC LANDMARK, AND IT'S OWNED BY BOB AND TRACEY LAWSON. SO THEY'RE IN THE NEWS A LOT THIS WEEK FROM THE WILEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY. AND I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. PLEASE TELL YOUR FRIENDS ABOUT THE EVENT, IF YOU WILL. PLEASE. THANK YOU. TURN IT OFF. SURE. THANK YOU. SO WITH THAT, THAT DOES COMPLETE OUR CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS. AND WE WILL NOW MOVE

[CONSENT AGENDA]

[1. Hold a Public Hearing, consider, and act upon, the writing of an ordinance for a change in zoning from Planned Development 2022-51 (PD 2022-51) to Commercial Corridor (CC) on 2.02 acres to allow for compatible retail uses. Property located at 703 N. Highway 78 (ZC 2026-01). ]

SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BROWN. AND IN 78, THAT REQUEST WAS ULTIMATELY DENIED BY COUNCIL.

AND SO WHAT THE APPLICANT IS ASKING NOW IS JUST TO ZONE THAT PROPERTY, COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR.

WHAT THAT WILL DO IS THAT WILL STRIP THE PD FROM THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY, WHICH UNFORTUNATELY FOR THEM, YOU KNOW, IT WAS PUT INTO PLACE TO ALLOW FOR THE DISTILLERY AND THE EVENT CENTER THAT WAS PLANNED ON GOING THERE. BUT BECAUSE THAT THE WAY THE PD WAS, WAS BROUGHT FORWARD, THAT'S THE ONLY TWO USES THAT ARE ALLOWED ON THERE. AND IN ORDER FOR THE THE PROPERTY TO BE USED AS ALL THE OTHER SURROUNDING PROPERTY IS, THEY'RE JUST ASKING FOR

[00:10:02]

ALL THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS STRAIGHT COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR ZONING. AND WE DID SEND OUT 25 NOTIFICATIONS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS. AND WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANYTHING FOR OR AGAINST IN THE PNC COMMISSION DID VOTE SIX ZERO TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL. THE APPLICANT IS HERE THIS EVENING, AND WITH THAT, I'LL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. NOT SEEING ANY QUICK QUESTIONS. SO OBVIOUSLY IT'S A PUBLIC HEARING THIS EVENING. SO WHAT I'LL DO IS I'LL MOVE FORWARD TO THE PUBLIC HEARING IN CASE THERE IS ANYONE PRESENT. SO PLEASE LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT I WILL OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ITEM. IF ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC IS PRESENT AND WISHES TO ADDRESS, COUNCIL WOULD ASK THAT YOU STEP FORWARD AT THIS TIME.

MISS STORM, PLEASE LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT NO ONE HAS STEPPED FORWARD TO SPEAK DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO WITH THAT, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COUNCIL, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS THIS EVENING FOR MR. HASKINS OR THE APPLICANT ON THIS ZONING REQUEST? MAYOR PRO TEM, THANKS, MAYOR. SO RIGHT NOW, IS PD, RIGHT? YES, SIR. OKAY. AND THEN NOW IT'S GOING TO STRAIGHT COMMERCIAL ZONING IF APPROVED, THAT IS THE REQUEST. YES, SIR. IS THE INTENT TO GET THE PROPERTY BIGGER IN TERMS OF DEVELOPMENT? ARE THEY IS THE INTENT FOR THEM TO EXTEND ON THIS PROPERTY THE CURRENTLY THE WAY IT IS AS OF RIGHT NOW, THE INTENT THE LAST TIME I TALKED TO THE APPLICANT WAS JUST TO BE ABLE TO MARKET THE PROPERTY WITHOUT THE RESTRICTIONS OF ONLY HAVING AN EVENT CENTER OR A DISTILLERY BE THE ALLOWED USE. SO THEY'RE NOT GOING TO USE IT FOR THE INITIAL USE THAT THEY BROUGHT IN FRONT OF US. THE LANDSCAPE BUSINESS ISN'T ALLOWED IN COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO. OKAY, BUT THERE'S NOTHING TO REACH TO RESTRICT THEM FROM USING THE PROPERTY AS AN OFFICE AND PARKING ALL THE OTHER VEHICLES IN THE PARKING LOT IN FRONT OF THEIR THEIR BUSINESS. AM I WRONG? IT WOULD BE THE SAME AS WHAT'S ALLOWED IN THE REST OF THAT SHOPPING CENTER. COULD BE WHATEVER USES ALLOWED THE LARGE CORRIDOR, LARGE SCALE COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT OR VEHICLES WILL NOT BE PROHIBITED FROM BEING FROM BEING PARKED IN THAT FRONT PARKING LOT. TO A CERTAIN EXTENT THEY WILL, BECAUSE THAT SORT OF THING ISN'T ALLOWED. IF YOU CAN SEE IT FROM A PUBLIC STREET. OKAY. I MEAN, THERE WOULD BE OBVIOUSLY I MEAN, THEY'RE IF THEY HAVE THE CORRECT LOADING ZONES AND THEY'RE PUT IN THE RIGHT SPOT AND THEY FOLLOW THE REST OF THE ORDINANCE. WHOEVER APPLIES FOR A COE, THEY'D HAVE TO GO THROUGH A SITE PLAN PROCESS WITH THE PNC COMMISSION. OKAY. SO I MEAN TO SAY NOT TO SAY THAT THERE WOULD NEVER BE LARGER, YOU KNOW, LIKE A BOX TRUCK OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT COULD POSSIBLY BE IN THERE IF THAT WAS PART OF THE BUSINESS. BUT THE INTENT IS TO KEEP THE PROPERTY OR SELL THE PROPERTY FOR THE NEW OWNER. YOU'D HAVE TO ASK THE PROPERTY OWNER, I DON'T KNOW. ARE THEY HERE? YES, SIR. HOWDY. GOOD TO SEE EVERYBODY AGAIN. IT'S MICHAEL THOMAS, 4007 TRAVIS STREET. I GUESS TO ADDRESS YOUR FIRST QUESTION, WE HAVE NO INTENT TO UTILIZE IT WITH OUR LANDSCAPING BUSINESS. THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE. BEFORE WE DIDN'T GET THE SUP. SO NOW WE ARE TRYING TO SELL OR LEASE THE ASSET TO A RETAIL USER. WE PROBABLY DON'T NEED TO BE BENDING DOWN, BUT I WAS GOING TO SAY IF YOU WANT TO, YOU CAN KIND OF ANGLE IT UP. WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO HERE. THANK YOU. WE THE PROPERTY'S BEEN ON THE MARKET FOR A YEAR. AND THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN INTERESTED HAVE BEEN ANYTHING FROM PERSONAL FITNESS TO DOGGY DAYCARES TO OTHER SIMILAR RETAIL USES. HAD A LOT OF PEOPLE INTERESTED IN IT. IF WE WERE ABLE TO GET THE SUP TO UTILIZE IT AS KIND OF A CONTRACTOR YARD OR QUASI CONTRACTOR YARD, OBVIOUSLY YOU GUYS DENIED THAT APP. SO WE'RE NOW PURSUING EITHER A SALE OR A LEASE TO A RETAIL USER THAT WOULD CONFORM TO THE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR DISTRICT. BUT YEAH, NO INTENT TO UTILIZE THIS SPACE FOR THE LANDSCAPE BUSINESS. ONE OF THE WHY I'M ASKING THESE QUESTIONS IS THAT THE CITY INVESTED A LOT OF TIME AND EFFORT ON BRINGING THAT TYPE OF BUSINESS TO THE CITY, CREATING THAT TYPE OF ENVIRONMENT TO THE CITY. AND SO I JUST DON'T WANT TO SCRAP ALL THE THOUGHT PROCESSES THAT WE'VE HAD AND CREATE SOMETHING NEW NOW BECAUSE IT'S NOT HAPPENING. AND SO OUR EDC INVESTED A LOT OF TIME AND INVESTMENT IN IT TO. SO THAT'S THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT HAS VALUE TO THE CITY. YEAH, I APPRECIATE THAT. AND I WOULD SAY THE INVESTORS IN THE BUSINESS ALSO PUT A LOT OF MONEY AND TIME INTO IT, NOT

[00:15:05]

I WANTED TO I WANTED TO MAKE SURE BECAUSE IT'S BEEN A NUMBER OF YEARS SINCE SINCE WE LISTENED TO ALL OF THAT. SO I WANTED TO MAKE SURE UNDERSTOOD THAT IF WE REMOVE THIS, IT DIDN'T HAVE A UNINTENDED OR MAYBE IT'S INTENDED, BUT RIGHT. UNKNOWN TO COUNCIL, IMPACT ON THE OTHER YES PORTION OF THE BUSINESS IF THEY'RE STILL LINKED TOGETHER. SO YEAH. AND IF I MAY ADDRESS THE MAYOR PRO TEM THE VALUE FOR THE CITY. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT IN THE APPLICANTS AWARE OF THIS AND WE WILL MAKE ANY POTENTIAL BUYER AWARE OF IT, THAT THAT SITE, THE SITE ITSELF STILL NEEDS A LITTLE BIT OF WORK. SO BEFORE IT'S EVER OPENED AS ANOTHER BUSINESS, IT WILL THERE WILL BE SOME DEFINITE IMPROVEMENTS BACK THERE. FOR EXAMPLE, THE THE THE LARGE PARKING LOT. THERE'S MORE THAN 12 SPACES IN A ROW. SO THERE'LL BE LIKE SOME LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, YOU KNOW, AND THAT SORT OF THING THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE PUT IN BEFORE A CEO OR ANYTHING WOULD BE ISSUED. AND THAT WAS THAT WAS GOING TO BE. MY QUESTION WAS WITH THE CHANGE IN ZONING, I WOULD ASSUME THAT THAT MEANS THAT DAMAGE IN THE PARKING LOT, LACK OF LANDSCAPING THAT WAS GOING TO BE INCLUDED ON THE BACK END, THOSE THINGS WOULD BE ADDRESSED WITH THE NEW USERS. YES. CORRECT. SINCE THERE'S A CHANGE IN ZONING. YES, SIR. OKAY.

THAT'S HELPFUL TO KNOW AS WELL. YES, SIR. OKAY. COUNCIL, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR EITHER THE APPLICANT OR MR. HASKINS ON THIS THIS EVENING. OKAY. WITH NONE INDICATED I WOULD BE OPEN TO A MOTION. COUNCILMAN STRANG THANK YOU. MAYOR. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS PRESENTED. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? COUNCILMAN HOOVER? I SECOND OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION WITH A SECOND TO APPROVE. COUNCIL, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE.

OKAY. THE MOTION DOES CARRY FIVE ZERO. APPRECIATE YOU ALL COMING BACK WITH A DIFFERENT PLAN. AFTER LISTENING AND SPEAKING WITH US LAST TIME. WITH THAT, WE WILL MOVE TO ITEM

[2. Consider, and act upon, Ordinance No. 2026-11, amending Wylie’s Code of Ordinances, Ordinance No. 2021-17, as amended, Appendix A (Comprehensive Fee Schedule), Article XI (Fire Department), Sections J, K, L, and M (Ambulance Service Fees); providing a savings/repealing clause, severability clause, penalty clause and an effective date; and providing for the publication of the caption hereof. ]

DASH 11 AMENDING WILEY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES. ORDINANCE NUMBER 2021, DASH 17, AS AMENDED.

APPENDIX A COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE ARTICLE 11 FIRE DEPARTMENT SECTIONS J, K, L, AND M AMBULANCE SERVICE FEES PROVIDING A SAVINGS, REPEALING CLAUSE, SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, PENALTY CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION HEREOF. CHIEF BLYTHE, GOOD EVENING MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THANK YOU. SO THE ITEM BEFORE YOU IS IN RESPONSE TO SENATE BILL 16 THAT WAS PASSED RECENTLY, AND I HAVE A SHORT PRESENTATION. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ALL WERE ABLE TO REVIEW THAT. I'LL BE GLAD TO GO THROUGH THAT OR JUST KIND OF SUMMARIZE IT, WHICHEVER YOU WOULD LIKE. IT'S ONLY A FEW SLIDES. WOULD YOU RATHER ME? YOU WANT ME TO GO THROUGH IT? MAYOR? WE'RE WE HAVE WE'RE DOING WELL ON TIME THIS EVENING, SO I'LL HURRY. IT'S FOR THE BENEFIT OF THOSE WHO HAVE ATTENDED THE MEETING OR MIGHT BE WATCHING IT ONLINE. GO AHEAD AND GO THROUGH THE SLIDES. OKAY, SO ON JANUARY 30TH THIS PAST YEAR, SENATE BILL 916 WAS ADOPTED. AND IT'S IN REGARDS TO TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. I'M SORRY, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND THE LIMITS THAT THEY PUT ON, HOW MUCH WE CAN INCREASE AMBULANCE SERVICE BILLINGS ANNUALLY. WHAT THAT SAYS IS, IS THAT THOSE EMS RATES CAN BE ADJUSTED ANNUALLY, AND THEY SET THE RATE BY EITHER THE MEDICARE AMBULANCE INFLATION FACTOR OR 10% OF THE PRIOR YEAR'S RATE. AND THAT RIGHT THERE IS PROBABLY THE MAIN REASON WE BROUGHT THIS IN FRONT OF YOU. THE INCREASE IS SLIGHT, BUT THERE'S NO CATCH UP. ACCORDING TO THIS, THIS SENATE BILL, THERE'S NO CATCH UP IN THE FUTURE. SO IF WE DON'T TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT 2% THIS YEAR, THERE WILL NOT BE ANY. WE WON'T BE ABLE TO DO THAT NEXT YEAR. WE'LL ONLY BE ABLE TO INCREASE WHAT THAT AMOUNT IS. SO WE

[00:20:02]

OKAY. THANK YOU FOR WALKING US THROUGH THAT. AS WELL AS PROVIDING THE DETAILED INFORMATION ON WHAT WE'RE SEEING, BOTH FROM A SUPPLY COST, OUR CONTRACTUAL FEES, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE AND ONE THING THAT ISN'T EVEN INCLUDED IN HERE IS PERSONNEL COSTS, WHICH OBVIOUSLY THOSE TEND TO INCREASE FROM YEAR TO YEAR AS WELL. AND GREAT TO HAVE ALL THE VEHICLES IN THE WORLD. IF WE DON'T HAVE PERSONNEL, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO MOVE. SO ABSOLUTELY. AND WE ONLY I MEAN, YOU'RE EXACTLY RIGHT, BUT WE ONLY FOCUSED ON THOSE ACCOUNTS BECAUSE THESE ARE THE THINGS THAT WE'RE BILLING FOR SOME CONSUMABLES WE BILLED FOR MILEAGE AND DIFFERENT THINGS LIKE THAT. SO YEAH, THE PERSONNEL COSTS DEFINITELY INCREASE AS WELL. SO AND THAT'S JUST TO POINT OUT THAT OBVIOUSLY WE'RE ABSORBING THE VAST MAJORITY OF THIS AS BEING ABSORBED WITHIN THE BUDGET. WE'RE NOT ASKING TO RATE, WE'RE NOT LOOKING TO RAISE IT. AND I KNOW WE CAN'T 20% TO TRY TO COVER THE COSTS THAT ARE BEING SEEN THERE. SO AGAIN, I THINK IT CLEARLY HAS BEEN LAID OUT. OBVIOUSLY DON'T LIKE TO INCREASE FEES ON ANYONE AT ANY TIME, BUT WHEN YOU SEE IT LAID OUT IN A DOLLAR AMOUNT, YOU'RE TALKING 3 TO $15 IS WHAT WOULD BE EXPECTED INCREASE THERE. SO I THINK MOST CITIZENS WOULD AGREE THAT WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO COVER THE BUDGET OF THE EMS DIVISION, BECAUSE THAT IS ONE PLACE FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, AND I BELIEVE MOST PEOPLE'S THAT YOU DON'T WANT TO TRY TO SAVE, SO TO SPEAK. RIGHT? YOU WANT TO HAVE THE BEST THAT WE CAN PROVIDE BECAUSE THAT'S SOMEBODY'S LIFE. SO I APPRECIATE ALL THE INFORMATION. I'LL TURN TO MY COLLEAGUES. DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR OTHER COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM THIS EVENING? MAYOR, IS THIS SOMETHING THAT YOU ALL WOULD LIKE US TO BRING FORWARD ANNUALLY? AS LONG AS THE SENATE BILL STAYS IN PLACE, THERE'S SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT POTENTIALLY GOING AWAY. BUT THAT'S ONE THING THAT WE WOULD WE WOULD LIKE SOME DIRECTION ON AS WELL. OKAY. SO I'LL GIVE YOU MINE. I WOULD SAY YES. OKAY. I WOULD SAY EVEN IF YOU ALL GET TO THE POINT WHERE THE SENATE BILL ISN'T IN PLACE, WHATEVER YOU GUYS ARE GETTING TO THAT YOU'RE PROPOSING, I THINK IT'S GREAT TO HAVE TRANSPARENCY AND MAKE SURE THAT EVERYONE, BOTH ON COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC, CAN CLEARLY UNDERSTAND ANY CHANGES, WHY THEY'RE BEING, WHY THOSE CHANGES ARE HAPPENING. I THINK I THINK MY COLLEAGUES WOULD AGREE FROM THE TRANSPARENCY SIDE OF THINGS THAT IT'S A GOOD THING TO DO. HOWEVER, I WANT TO LET THEM SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES. SO I WILL ASK THEM. COUNCILMAN STRING. I SUPPORT YOU. OKAY. COUNCILMAN HOOVER, I SUPPORT IT. OKAY? COUNCILMAN DUKE, I SUPPORT AND MAYOR PRO TEM IN SUPPORT. OKAY. SO YES. OKAY. IF YOU'LL BRING THOSE BACK TO US

[00:25:06]

THAT MOTION CARRIES

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.