[CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:09] AT THIS TIME, I WOULD LIKE TO CALL TO ORDER THE MARCH 28TH 2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR THE CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS, AT THE WIDELY MUNICIPAL CENTER. THE TIME IS 601 PM WE DO ASK THAT IF YOU HAVE A CELL PHONE WITH YOU THIS EVENING THAT YOU WOULD PLEASE SET IT TO VIBRATE. IF YOU DO NEED TO TAKE A CALL WHILE PRESENT, WE DO ASK THAT YOU STEP OUT TO OUR ATRIUM SO AS NOT TO DISTURB PROCEEDINGS. MADAM CITY SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE TAKE ROLE AT THIS TIME? YES MAYOR MAYOR MATTHEW PORTER, COUNCILMAN DAVID ARE DUKE COUNCILMAN DAVE STRING COUNCILMAN. STRENGTH WILL BE UNABLE TO MAKE IT THIS EVENING. MAYOR PRO TEM GEOFF FORESTER MAYOR PRO TEM FORRESTER WILL BE UNABLE TO MAKE IT THIS EVENING. COUNCILMAN SCOTT WILLIAMS PRESIDENT COUNCILMAN TIMOTHY WALLACE. RUNNING BEHIND. COUNCILMAN GARRETT MICE PRESENT WE HAVE A QUORUM MAYOR THANK YOU MISS STORM AT THIS TIME, IF YOU PLEASE STAND FOR THE INVOCATION TO BE LED BY COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS , FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE, LED BY COUNCILMAN MAYES. PLEASE PRAY WITH ME. AWESOME FATHER. WE THANK YOU FOR THE ABILITY TO COME TOGETHER IN A FREE NATION AND A FREE CITY. UM AND MAKE DECISIONS THAT IMPACT ALL OF US . WE ASK THAT YOU WILL HELP LEAD US WITH WISDOM. IN YOUR DIRECTION, HELP OUR COMMUNITY. AND OUR FIRST RESPONDERS, LORD WE PRAY THAT YOU'LL GIVE THEM STRENGTH. WISDOM. GUIDANCE AND DIRECTION AS WELL AS OURSELVES. THANK YOU FOR ALL THAT YOU DO. IT'S IN JESUS CHRIST'S NAME. WE PRAY. AMEN. I PLEDGED ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. UNLESS. 30. PLEASE BE SEATED. BUT THAT WILL MOVE TO OUR COMMENTS. ONLINE AGENDA ITEMS IF [COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS] ANY CITIZEN IS PRESENT THIS EVENING AND WISHES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM NOT ON OUR AGENDA. WE DO ASK THAT YOU WOULD COMPLETE A FORM BEFORE MISS STORM. I BELIEVE WE HAD A FORM TURNED IN. I WILL REMIND, UH THOSE SPEAKING THAT YOU WILL HAVE UP TO THREE MINUTES IF YOU'RE REPRESENTING YOURSELF OR SIX. IF YOU'RE REPRESENTING A GROUP AND UNDER THE TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT, THE COUNCIL CANNOT RESPOND OR CONVERSE WITH ANYONE SPEAKING ON AN ITEM NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA. I MISSED TINA STOMACH. AND IF YOUR STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. YEAH. IF YOU HIT THE LOOKS LIKE A LITTLE GUYS TALKING THANK YOU. THAT'S IT. TINA STILL MICKEY 58 01 VISTA GLEN LANE, AND THAT'S IN SAXONY, TEXAS, 75048. MAYOR. CITY COUNCIL. AND CITY STAFF. I AM HERE ON BEHALF OF THE WILY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TONIGHT, AND I WANTED TO THANK EVERYONE FOR COMING OUT TO OUR STATE OF THE CITY LUNCHEON. IT REALLY IS ONE OF THE HIGHLIGHTS OF OUR ANNUAL LUNCHEON CALENDAR. AND WE, OF COURSE, HAD A TREMENDOUS TURNOUT. AND JUST WANTED TO THANK EVERYONE FOR YOUR TIME TAKING TIME OUT OF YOUR BUSY SCHEDULE AND ALSO TO MAYOR FOR PROVIDING SO MUCH INTERESTING AND VALUABLE INFORMATION TO EVERYONE THAT WAS IN ATTENDANCE. AND THEN ALSO, I WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT COMING UP ON APRIL 20TH. WE ARE RETURNING TO OUR COMMUNITY AWARDS BANQUET WE HAVEN'T HAD ONE IN FOUR YEARS DOESN'T SEEM POSSIBLE THAT IT'S BEEN THAT LONG. I'VE HAD A LOT OF QUESTIONS OF WHAT IS IT SO THAT SHOWS HOW LONG IT'S BEEN BECAUSE WE'VE HAD SEVERAL PEOPLE THAT HAVE NEVER BEEN TO THIS EVENT BEFORE, AND IT IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE CHAMBER TO THANK VOLUNTEERS AND TO RECOGNIZE SOME OF OUR LEADERS IN THE COMMUNITY. IT ALSO IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ANY ORGANIZATION THAT WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE TO USE THAT FORUM AS A WAY TO PROVIDE A, UM AN AWARD TO EITHER ONE OF THEIR MEMBERS FROM A COMMITTEE OR A NON PROFIT. SO IT REALLY IS MORE THAN JUST THE CHAMBER AND HAVING THAT OPPORTUNITY, SO I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WAS ON YOUR CALENDAR. WE'VE GOT SEVERAL OTHER GREAT EVENTS COMING UP AND SOME TREMENDOUS PROGRAMS. BUT MOST OF ALL, I WANTED TO THANK ALL OF YOU FOR BEING THERE LAST WEEK, AND WHAT A VALUABLE LUNCH AND IT WAS SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH. HAVE A GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU. THE STORM. I SHOWED THAT TO BE THE ONLY FORM THAT WAS TURNED [CONSENT AGENDA] [00:05:04] IN THIS EVENING. SO WITH THAT WE WILL MOVE TO OUR CONSENT AGENDA. HAVE ANY MEMBER OF STAFF FOR COUNCIL HAS ANY ITEM THEY WOULD LIKE PULLED FOR INDIVIDUAL DISCUSSION OR CONSIDERATION. PLEASE SPEAK NOW. WITH NON INDICATED I'D BE OPEN TO EMOTION ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. COUNCILMAN DUKE. YES MR MAYOR. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ALL THE ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS? SECOND, IT WE DO HAVE EMOTION WITH THE SECOND TO APPROVE COUNCIL, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES 50 WITH COUNCILMAN STRING AND MAYOR [1. Hold a Public Hearing to consider, and act upon, an amendment to the Browngate Pointe Planned Development 2020-43, to allow for a modification of the construction schedule terms of the townhome/commercial development. Property generally located on the northeast corner of Brown Street and Sanden Blvd. (ZC 2023-06).] PROTEIN FORRESTER. ABSENT WITH THAT WE WILL MOVE TO OUR REGULAR AGENDA. ITEM ONE HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ACT UPON AN AMENDMENT TO THE BROWN GATE POINT PLAN DEVELOPMENT 2020-43 TO ALLOW FOR A MODIFICATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE TERMS OF THE TOWN HOME COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPERLY. GENT PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED. AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BROWN STREET AND SANDON BOULEVARD ZONING CASE 2023-6. MR HASKINS. THANK YOU, MAYOR. MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. LET ME. UM THIS PARTICULAR ZONING CASE IS THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR A , UM, AMENDMENTS TO THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION TERMS THAT WERE IN THE PD THAT WAS APPROVED BACK IN 2020. UM THIS WAS FOR A MIXED USED DEVELOPMENT WHERE YOU HAD A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY THERE ON LOT ONE TRACKED ONE. IT'S IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER NEXT TO THE DEVELOPMENT ARE NEXT TO THE DETENTION POND. ALONG WITH EIGHT TOWN HOME BUILDINGS FOR A TOTAL OF 39 UNITS. UM WHAT THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR IS A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR ABOUT HALF. OF THE TOWN HOME BUILDINGS TO BE BUILT BEFORE THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING NEEDS TO BE STARTED. THE ORIGINAL TERMS OF THAT PD REQUIRED THAT BASICALLY THAT THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND THE TOWN HOME BUILDINGS BE STARTED AT THE SAME TIME. UM THEY. HAVE HAD ALL OF THE FLAT WORK IS PRETTY MUCH DONE IN THAT AREA. UM, FOR THAT DEVELOPMENT, SO THE COMMERCIAL UH, CONCRETE. YOU KNOW, THE PARKING AREA THAT DRIVES AND ALL THAT IS COMPLETE. THEY JUST DON'T WANT TO ACTUALLY START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING ITSELF UNTIL THEY GET A COUPLE OF THE TOWN HOMES BUILT. ONE THING ELSE THAT THEY DID ASK FOR, BUT P AND Z RECOMMENDED, UM THAT IT NOT BE INCLUDED. AND SO STAFF REMOVED IT WHEN THEY WHEN PNC MADE THE RECOMMENDATION WAS THE APPLICANT ALSO WANTED TO NOT REBUILD THE SIDEWALK, AND THAT GOES A LONG STANDING BOULEVARD ARE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. THERE IS A SIDEWALK THERE RIGHT NOW, BUT IT'S PRETTY AGED, AND IT'S ABOUT THREE FT WIDE. IT DOESN'T MEAN CURRENT CITY STANDARDS AND THE APPLICANT UNDER THE ORIGINAL PD DID, UM, AGREE TO REBUILD THAT SIDEWALK TO CURRENT STANDARDS. THEY HAD ASKED TO BE ABLE TO FORGO THAT, UM, AND STILL DO THEIR FINAL PLAQUE. UM GET THEIR FINAL PLAN FILED ON THE FIRE IMPLANT HAS BEEN APPROVED. TO GET THE FINAL FINAL PLATFORM FILED WITHOUT REBUILDING THAT SIDEWALK. UM PMC DISAGREED WITH THAT AND SO STAFF REMOVED. THAT IS ONE OF THE STIPULATIONS. UM ONCE THAT WAS REMOVED, AND PNC DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL. 70 WITH THAT I'M MORE THAN HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS, AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE THIS EVENING. JANE. COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS. THANK YOU. MAYOR I FIRST QUESTION IS ON THE WHEN YOU SAY THE PARKING AND EVERYTHING. ARE YOU SAYING THAT THE FOUNDATION FOR THE COMMERCIAL STRIP CENTER ON THAT CORNER. THAT FOUNDATION HAS DONE AND HAS PASSED INSPECTION. FOUNDATION IS NOT THERE. WHAT I'M SAYING IS, THE FLAT WORK IS DONE. IN OTHER WORDS, THE FOR THE SUBDIVISION PART ITSELF, IN OTHER WORDS, THE PARKING AND DR ISLES, AND WHEN I BREAK THE NUMBERS DOWN, I KNOW THE ORIGINALS BY PERCENTAGE, AND THE REVISED IS BY NUMBER, CAN YOU CAN YOU SAY ON THE NUMBER 22? WHAT PERCENTAGE THAT IS OF THE TOTAL OR 56. OKAY? THANK YOU. UM . SO IF WE'RE WANTING MAYBE I'M MISSING SOMETHING HERE. I'LL READ BETTER AND COME BACK. I GUESS I THINK I'M CONFUSED AS [00:10:10] FAR AS THEIR CHANGES. THE DIFFERENCE IN THE WHAT WAS THERE BEFORE, SO MAYBE YOU CAN DUMB IT DOWN FOR ME, AND THIS MAY PREDATE SEVERAL MEMBERS TIME ON COUNCIL WITH WHEN IT ORIGINALLY CAME THROUGH, I BELIEVE WAS 2020 . ORIGINALLY WHEN IT CAME THROUGH UM, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT WAS PUT IN PLACE SAID THAT IN ORDER TO GET A CEO AND ACTUALLY SELL THOSE TOWN HOMES THEY HAD TO HAVE THE COMMERCIAL CEO I BELIEVE OBTAINED AT THE SAME TIME. SO WHAT THEY'RE REQUESTING IS THAT 56% THOSE 22 THAT THEY CAN GET THE CEO ON THOSE BEFORE THEY GET THE CEO FOR THE COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE AND REACH BUILDING IT, SO ESSENTIALLY, THEY'RE ASKING IF THEY CAN FINISH AND SELL SOME OF THE TOWN HOMES FIRST. BUT UNDER THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, THEY HAVE TO FINISH THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT AT THE SAME TIME. THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT I WAS READING. SO THE WAY I ACTUALLY READ IT AND CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG IS UM, THEY JUST CAN'T GET ANY RESIDENTIAL FINALS UNTIL THEIR THEIR FOUNDATION IS IN. ON THE COMMERCIAL. THAT'S THE WAY THEY ORIGINALLY RIGHT, SO IT'S NOT THAT THEY CANNOT SEE OF THE IT'S NOT THAT THEY IT'S THEIR WANTING TO FINISH SOME OF THE TOWN HOMES AND BEFORE THEY START ANY OF THE COMMERCIAL CORRECT WHICH I BUT I JUST WANTED TO BE CLEAR THAT THEY HAVE DONE AND I ONLY MENTIONED THIS BECAUSE WE'VE HAD OTHER UH, REQUEST SIMILAR TO THIS. UM BUT THEY'RE ONE THAT MAKES THE ONE THING THAT DOES MAKE THIS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT. IS THAT IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE THE DR ISLES AND EVERYTHING ARE IN PLACE. I BELIEVE THAT THEY'RE GENERALLY COMMITTED TO THAT BEING A COMMERCIAL SPOT. SO MY QUESTION IS. WHAT LEVERAGE AS A CITY DO WE HAVE IF HOUSES IN THAT DEVELOPMENT ARE OCCUPIED. PRIOR TO THE COMMERCIAL BEING STARTED THAT THE COMMERCIAL WILL EVER BE STARTED OR THAT THE PROJECT WILL FAIL TO HIT THE STAND, YOU KNOW? WE CAN ONLY GO TO 22 UNITS. IF THEY'RE ALLOWED 39. AND THEY CAN ONLY GO TO 22 BEFORE THEY HAVE TO START THE COMMERCIAL. THEY WILL NOT GET THE 23RD UNIT. WITHOUT THE COMMERCIAL BEING STARTED. AND ONE OTHER QUESTION JUST BECAUSE YOU MIGHT KNOW. THE WHEN I SAW IT GRADED. ORIGINALLY THE DETENTION POND WAS ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. THAT'S ALWAYS BEEN OVER THERE ON THE OKAY. IT WAS BEFORE MY TIME, BUT WHEN I SAW THEM GREAT, AND I WAS LIKE IT'S OVER HERE AND THEN AM I KNOW HOW THEY WERE DOING SOMETHING. OKAY I'LL DEFER TO ANYTHING. YOU'RE WELCOME, SIR. AND LET ME DO THIS. LET ME UM, I KNOW. WE HAVE. THE APPLICANT IS HERE. OR REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE APPLICANT. LET ME GIVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK THAT WAY, IF THEY WANT TO KIND OF EXPLAIN WHAT THEIR REQUEST IS. THEY CAN DO SO AND THEN FIELD QUESTIONS FROM US. GOOD EVENING COUNCIL AND MAYOR. IF YOU STATE YOUR NAME, AND IT CAN BE THE COMPANY ADDRESS BRANCH, 37, 21, SOUTH, STONEBRIDGE AND MCKINNEY. AND WE APPRECIATE YOU TAKING THE TIME TO VISIT WITH US. SO THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT WAS THAT WE NEED TO START THE FOUNDATION. AT THE SAME TIME WE STARTED THE REST OF THE BUILDING. WE COULDN'T GET ANY C O S. SO NOW WE'RE ASKING TO MOVE THE FOUNDATION TO AFTER WE GET 22. C O S. AS FAR AS THE FRAMING THE FRAMING WAS ALSO AT THE WAS AT THE ORIGINAL 50% AND THEN THE SHELL WAS AT 85. SO ARE OTHER. ASK ON THAT WAS TO REQUEST THAT WE GET THE FRAMING AND THE SHELL DONE AT THE 85% OR 33 OF THE C. E. O S. AND IT'S JASON WAS MENTIONED BEFORE ALL THE FLAT WORKS DONE. WE'VE GOT THE DRIVEWAYS. WE'VE GOT THE PARKING IN THERE. THE PARKING SPACES. ALL THE FIRE LANES ARE IN THEIR ROAD SIGNS. UM HYDRANTS. ALL OF THAT'S ALREADY THERE WITH WITH THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING. WE'VE ALSO REACHED OUT TO THE SEA FOR HELP FINDING TENANTS FOR THAT AS WELL. DO YOU MIND IF I ASK? WHAT THE THANK YOU, MAYOR WILLIAMS. I WAS THINKING OF HOLDING THE FLOOR. I WASN'T SORRY ABOUT THAT, UM DO YOU MIND IF I ASK WHAT THE REASON FOR THE MOVE? MAYBE THAT WILL HELP US SEE THE OVERALL PROJECT PROJECTION. AND YES, SIR. ABSOLUTELY SO WE THIS KIND APPROVED ORIGINALLY IN 2020. OUR BUDGET WAS BASED ON 2020 NUMBERS. AND WHO KNEW THAT 2021 2022 IS GOING TO HAVE AS HIGH AN INFLATION WITH THE NUMBERS AND THE CONSTRUCTION CAUSE DELAY WITH SHORTAGE OF MATERIALS AND LABOR, AND THAT'S WHAT IT WAS. WE GOT WAY BEHIND ON THAT. SO WE'RE JUST ASKING FOR MERCY FROM YOU GUYS TO HELP US THROUGH THIS, AND THEN THAT WAY WE CAN GET THE 20 TO BUILD TIME CEOS GET THOSE SOLD. AND THEN START ON THE FRAMING FOR [00:15:05] THE COMMERCIAL AFTER THAT. MHM. SO WOULD IT BE FAIR TO SAY IT'S RELATED TO CASH FLOW FOR THE PROJECT? YES SIR. YES, SIR. THAT'S CORRECT. AND THESE ARE TOWN HOMES. THEY'RE NOT APARTMENTS. THERE ARE 3000 SQUARE FOOT LIVES. SO IT'S LARGER. OKAY? IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU'D LIKE TO ADD? I BELIEVE THAT'S IT. IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THIS COUNCIL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR EITHER STAFF OR FOR THE REPRESENTATIVE. MR BRANCH. IT DOESNT APPEAR THERE ARE ANY OKAY, THANK YOU. THANK YOU, SIR. SO WITH THAT, UM . I WOULD BE OPEN TO EMOTION ON THE ITEM. I APOLOGIZE. IT'S A PUBLIC HEARING BECAUSE IT'S A ZONE IN CASE CHANGE. SO WITH THAT. OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ITEM IF ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC IS PRESIDENT AND WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE. WE WOULD ASK THAT YOU STEP FORWARD AT THIS TIME. MISS STORM. PLEASE LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT NO ONE HAS CHOSEN TO STEP FORWARD TO SPEAK DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO WITH THAT I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC CLEARING. AND NOW I WOULD BE OPEN TO A MOTION ON THE ITEM. COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS . THANK YOU, MAYOR. I'D MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM IS PRESENTED. OKAY WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS PRESENTED. DO WE HAVE A SECOND COUNCILMAN DICK? YES. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. I'LL SECOND OKAY. WE DO HAVE A MOTION WITH THE SECOND TO APPROVE HIS PRESENTED. COUNCIL. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. MOTION CARRIES 4 TO 1 WITH COUNCILMAN WALLACE SUPPOSED AND COUNCILMAN STRAINING AND MAYOR PROTEIN FORRESTER ABSENT. WITH [2. Hold a Public Hearing, to consider, and act upon, a change in zoning from Agricultural (AG/30) and Commercial Corridor (CC) to Light Industrial - Special Use Permit (LI-SUP) on 14.03 acres generally located on the southwest corner of Old Alanis and West Alanis Drive (ZC 2023-01).] THAT WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM TWO. WHICH IS TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON THE CHANGE IN ZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL 30 AND COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR C C TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL SPECIAL USE PERMIT. L I S U P ON 14.3 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OLD ALAN EASE, AND WEST ALLEN. EAST DRIVE ZONING CASE, 2023-1. MR HASKINS . THANK YOU, MAYOR. UM THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE ABOUT 14 ACRES IN ORDER TO DO A ABOUT 100,000 SQUARE FOOT. UM LIGHT. I'M SORRY WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION CENTER. UM THE USE IS INTENDED FOR A FACILITY FOR LIKE, CODING AND PRE MANUFACTURED. UH WINDOWS. UM IN ADDITION TO THE USE, WHICH IS REQUIRED EVEN IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AREA FOR AN S, U P E S U P DOES ALLOW FOR THE BAY DOORS, UM, WHICH YOU CAN SEE BEYOND THE RIGHT SIDE OF THAT IT'S ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. BUT ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF WHAT YOU SEE ON YOUR SCREEN, THOSE BAY DOORS FACE ALEDMYS THAT'S NOT NORMALLY ALLOWED, UM, ON UH, UNDER NORMAL ZONING. HOWEVER THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR THAT IN THE SUV CONDITIONS, BUT ALSO THEY ARE REQUIRED TO BE SCREENING IT WITH LANDSCAPING. AND YOU HAVE THAT LANDSCAPE. UM EXHIBIT IN THE PACKET. IT'S THE PAGE RIGHT AFTER THIS ONE. SEE RIGHT THERE. SO THEY'LL BE FRIED PROVIDING LANDSCAPE FOR THAT, UM IN ADDITION TO THAT THE APPLICANT IS, UM GOING TO PROVIDE A FENCE ABOARD ON BOARD FENCE ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY BETWEEN THEM AND THE MOBILE HOME PARK. THERE WAS A DIFFERENT COUPLE DIFFERENT OPTIONS LOOKED AT THERE AND, UM STAFF WORKING WITH THE APPLICANT FELT THAT THAT WAS THE BEST OPTION OVERALL IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SOME KIND OF DIVISION BETWEEN THE TWO PROPERTIES. UM, THE UH, COUNT PLAN. THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE PROPOSED, UM APPLICATION, AND IF THE ZONING IS APPROVED, THEY STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE APPLICANT. WE STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH SITE PLANNING AND PLANNING. NOTIFICATION WAS SENT TO SIX SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS, AND WE RECEIVED ONE RESPONSE IN FAVOR AND NONE IN OPPOSITION. AND AFTER A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT JUST THE NATURE OF THE BUSINESS AND OPERATING HOURS. THE PNC DID RECOMMEND APPROVAL 70 WITH THAT THE APPLICANT IS HERE THIS EVENING. AND WITH THAT, I'LL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY? SO I WILL OPEN THIS FOR QUESTIONS. WE HAVE FOR STAFF. COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS. THANK YOU FOR THE AFRICAN. I APOLOGIZE. SURE NO, NO. THIS THIS IS FOR MR HASKINS. UM THE BOARD ON BOARD FENCE. YES, SIR SAID I THOUGHT YOU SAID EAST SIDE. IS THAT RIGHT? YES IT WILL BE ON THE SOUTH OF THIS WILL BE ON THE BOTTOM OF THE BOTTOM OF THE MAP. HERE. I GOT YOU. THAT'S WHAT I WAS HAVING A HARD TIME LOCATING. YES, SIR. IT SAYS IT'S KIND OF SMALL RIGHT BECAUSE THE SCALES SO BIG, BUT IT SAYS PROPOSED BOARD ON BOARD FENCE THERE. [00:20:01] THANK YOU. OKAY, WELL, WELL. COUNCIL IS LOOKING I'M GOING TO I WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ITEM. IF ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC IS HERE AND WOULD LIKE TO STEP FORWARD AND SPEAK ON THIS ITEM AND ASKED TO DO SO, THIS TIME. MISS STORM, PLEASE LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT NO ONE CHOSE TO STEP FORWARD AND SPEAK ON THIS ISLAND DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, SO WITH THAT I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND COUNCIL. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF FOR THE DEVELOPER, COUNCILMAN WALLACE. YES SORRY. I JUST MADE NOT NO BUT WHAT IS MEANT BY CANOPY. LIKE ARE THEY JUST TALKING TARPS? NO IT'LL BE LIKE THE METAL EYEBROWS. OKAY OR THE OR THE FLAT. UM, METAL CANOPIES. THAT'S KIND OF KIND OF CANTILEVER. OKAY, CANOPY, OKAY? ALRIGHT I JUST DIDN'T KNOW IF WE HAD ANY LIKE ELEVATIONS THAT SHOW THOSE OR HAVE ELEVATIONS AT THIS TIME BUT BASED ON THE P D, AND THE INTENT WHEN THEY COME THROUGH WITH A SITE PLAN STAFF AND P AND Z WILL MAKE SURE THAT IT MEETS THE ARCHITECTURAL INTENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. OKAY I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THEY WERE GOING TO STRING SOME TARP UP THERE. YES, SIR. NO. NOT DOING THAT. COUNCIL AND MIGHT UM , THIS THIS MAY BE A QUESTION FOR YOU OR THE APPLICANTS. UM AND I APOLOGIZE. I HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO WATCH THE PNC MEETING . SO SOME OF THIS MAY HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED. AS YOU MENTIONED THE NATURE OF THE BUSINESS WAS DISCUSSED TO SOME EXTENT. BUT MY QUESTION IS UM, WHEN IT COMES TO THE INTENDED USE AFRICA LOADING OF PRE MANUFACTURED WINDOWS. UH GIVEN THAT THIS IS ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL AREA, YOU KNOW, OF COURSE, WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE RESIDENTS ARE NOT GOING TO EXPERIENCE YOU KNOW, CERTAINLY AT THE WORST, AND HE SORT OF EXPOSURE TO UNNECESSARY OR UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF CHEMICALS, BUT, UM, YOU KNOW, SECONDARILY TO THAT THAT IT WON'T BE AND OBNOXIOUS THING TO BE NEXT TO IN TERMS OF ANY SORT OF, YOU KNOW, FUMES OR ODOROUS DISCHARGED THINGS OF THAT NATURE , SO I'M JUST CURIOUS IF ANYONE HAS ANY INSIGHT ON THAT THAT THEY COULD PROVIDE TO ME. DON'T UM, I'LL LET THE APPLICANT ADDRESS THAT IN MORE DETAIL, COUNCILMAN, IF THAT'S OKAY, UM ONE THING I CAN SAY IS, UM WE'VE BEEN TOLD THAT THE ENTIRE OPERATION WILL TAKE PLACE IN INDOORS. OKAY SO THERE WON'T BE ANY ACTUAL STORAGE OR MANUFACTURING PROCESSES OR ANYTHING THAT WILL BE OUTSIDE. OK BUT IF YOU NEED ANY FURTHER INFORMATION, I CAN HAVE THE APPLICANT COME UP AND DISCUSS IT. IF THEY HAVE ANY MORE INFORMATION TO SHARE. I'D LOVE TO LEARN IT AND YOU KNOW, I'M NOT AN EXPERT BY ANY MEANS ON WENT PRE PRE MANUFACTURED WINDOW COATING, SO I WOULD ASSUME THAT THE MAJORITY OF THAT INCLUDES THE APPLICATION OF A CHEMICAL OR SOME KIND, OR, YOU KNOW SOME SORT OF PROCESS TO APPLY TO THE TO THE GLASS, BUT I KNOW THAT SOME ALSO MIGHT INCLUDE LAYING AN ACTUAL FILM ON TOP OF IT, BUT I ASSUME IT MIGHT BE MORE SOPHISTICATED THAN THAT. I DON'T KNOW. I'M JUST CURIOUS WHAT YOU CAN SHARE WITH ME. STATE YOUR NAME COMPANY ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. KILLIAN'S WORTH , 49 TO 5. GREENVILLE AVENUE, DALLAS, TEXAS, 75 TO 04. UM SO IT AS MORE OF THE SECOND OF WHAT YOU WERE SAYING. IT'S A FILM CODING THAT JUST GETS RUN THROUGH LIKE THE LAMINATE ER MACHINE KIND OF AND BAKES ON THAT FILM COATING TO IT, SO THERE AREN'T ANY TALK TO TOXIC FUMES OR ANYTHING OF THAT NATURE. UM AND AS HE WAS REFERENCING EVERYTHING'S INSIDE AND THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE DISCHARGE FROM THE FACILITY. OKAY, WELL, THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT, AND I'M GLAD THAT YOU WERE ABLE TO ANSWER MY QUESTION THAT IT WAS KIND OF MORE OF THE SECOND TYPE AND APPLICATION OF LIKE A SOLID RIGHT LAMINATE. BASICALLY THAT DOES, YOU KNOW? GIVE ME UH YOU KNOW, A LOT OF HOPE THAT IT'S GOING TO NOT AFFECT THE NEARBY RESIDENTS IN THE WAY THAT I WAS DESCRIBING, SO THANK YOU. ABSOLUTELY. COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. QUESTION WAS FOR MR HASKINS. UM STRENGTHENS HASKINS. COULD YOU SPEAK TO THE S U P ON THE DARK STORAGE FACING THE STREETS IN THE INTENT BEHIND THAT THE NEED FOR THAT S U P SURE. UM NORMALLY , UM, WE THEIR ZONING ORDINANCE ZONING ORANGE DOESN'T ALLOW FOR LOADING OR SERVICE AREAS TO FACE A PUBLIC STREET WELL TO BE SEEN FROM A PUBLIC STREET. UM AND THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING LANDSCAPING. TO SCREEN IT, UM WHEN IT. HOLD ME BACK UP WHEN IT CAN WHEN IT DOES FACE THE STREET, AND IT'S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE SEEN THAT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRES A MASONRY WALL. SO WHAT THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING [00:25:03] WHICH WE THINK IN OUR IN OUR OPINION, IT LOOKS BETTER AND THERE'S ROOM FOR IT IS TO JUST DO A BUNCH OF SCREENING THAT BEING SAID. TECHNICALLY SOMEBODY COULD SEE THROUGH THE TREES IF THEY WERE DOWN LOW ENOUGH AND POSSIBLY SEE THE SCREENING AREA. SO THAT'S WHY IT HAS TO BE A CONDITION OF THE S U P WHICH MAKES PERFECT SENSE, AND I'M ASSUMING WITH IT BEING THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING, AND NOT AS MANY SPOTS THAT LEADS LENDS TO MAKING IT EASIER FOR US TO LOOK AT IT FROM AN ISSUE P STANDPOINT AND NOT THE ENTIRE BUILDING IS FACING THE STREET. YES, SIR. AND THAT WAS PART OF THE CHALLENGE, AND THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS THAT THE APPLICANT PROPOSED WHAT THEY DID WAS BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING. THEY NEEDED IT PRETTY MUCH HAD TO BE TURNED IN THAT DIRECTION. SO, YES. I THINK SOMETHING THAT PROBABLY GOES ALONG WELL WITH IT IS THAT ALLEN EAST IS MORE OF A COMMERCIALIZED STREET AND IS SET TO END UP WIDENING AND HEAVIER, TRAPPED AND NOT SO MUCH OF ITS RESIDENTIAL. YES, SIR. EVERYTHING EXCEPT TO THE EAST IS ALL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OR INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME TO AND I'LL ADD. I DO DRIVE BY THERE QUITE FREQUENTLY, AND I THINK I WOULD PREFER TO SEE GOOD LANDSCAPING, AS OPPOSED TO JUST A MASONRY WALL JUST FOR THE AESTHETICS, AND OBVIOUSLY THERE'S A CREEK NEAR THERE THAT I DON'T THINK SOME OF THAT FLOOD PLAINS WILL BE DEVELOPED, BUT YOU NEVER KNOW. BUT I'D LOVE TO SEE A LITTLE BIT MORE GREENERY KEPT ALONG THE DRIVE LANE AS OPPOSED TO A SIX OR EIGHT FT MASONRY WALL AND OUR SOIL DOESN'T HOLD UP VERY WELL TO THIS LOOKING IN GOOD REPAIR FOR A LONG TIME, EITHER, AS WE'VE SEEN THROUGHOUT TOWN, AND SO, WITH HIS BUSY AS THE STREET IS, I THINK THAT WOULD BE A LITTLE NICER OF A LOOK. PERSONALLY. COUNCIL ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THAT WE HAVE FOR EITHER STAFF OR FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY WITH NONE INDICATED, AND THE PUBLIC HEARING COMPLETED, I WOULD BE OPEN TO A MOTION ON THE ITEM. COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS. THANK YOU, MAYOR. I'D MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEMS PRESENTED HAVE EMOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS PRESENTED. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? COUNCILMAN DUKE. YES, MR MAYOR. THANK YOU. I WILL. SECOND WE HAVE A MOTION WITH THE SECOND TO APPROVE THE ITEMS PRESENTED. COUNCIL POLICE CAST YOUR VOTE. THE MOTION CARRIES 50 WITH COUNCILMAN STRING AND MAYOR PRO TEM FORRESTER ABSENT WITH THAT WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM NUMBER THREE. WHICH IS TO HOLD A PUBLIC [3. Hold a Public Hearing to consider, and act upon, an amendment to Planned Development 2014-28 and a zoning change from Commercial Corridor to Planned Development - Light Industrial (PD-LI) to allow for an expansion of the area where light industrial uses are allowed. Property generally located east of the intersection of Business Way and Commerce Drive (ZC 2023-03).] HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON AN AMENDMENT TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT , 2014 28 AND A ZONING CHANGE FROM COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PD L I TO ALLOW FOR AN EXPANSION OF THE AREA WHERE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES ARE ALLOWED PROPERTY, GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF BUSINESS WAY AND COMMERCE DRIVE ZONING CASE 2023-3. AND I WILL REMIND COUNSEL AND MAKE SURE MR HASKINS KNOWS WE DID HAVE TO BELIEVE LATE PUBLIC COMMENT FORMS THAT DID NOT MAKE THE PACKET COUNCIL HAS A COPY OF THOSE NO COMMENTS WERE INCLUDED ONE FOR AND ONE AGAINST MR HASKINS. THANK YOU, MAYOR. UM AS MENTIONED APPLICANT IS ASKING TO BASICALLY EXPANDED AN EXISTING PLAN DEVELOPMENT. THAT WAS APPROVED BACK IN 2014. THIS WILL ALLOW FOR LIGHT. UM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES ON THE PROPERTY. WHERE THE RED OUTLINE IS, AS OPPOSED TO WHERE JUST THE KIND OF THE AQUAMARINE. COLOR SHADED AREA IS THAT'S WHERE THE CURRENT PD COVERS AND THIS IS PART OF AN OVERALL LARGER DEVELOPMENT. UM THIS PARTICULAR PD WILL COVER LOTS 56 AND SEVEN THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE ZONING CASE, 123 AND FOUR WOULD REMAIN ZONED COMMERCIAL. UM THE PD CONDITIONS DO, UM, ALLOW FOR A LUMBER YARD IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA. UM, THAT'S THE GENERAL PLAN GOING FORWARD, AND THERE'S ACTUALLY A UM, ZONING EXHIBIT. ALSO THAT SHOWS THAT THE INITIAL , UH, PLAN FOR THAT PARTICULAR AREA? UM THE P D DOES ALSO PROHIBIT LIST OF USES THAT ARE PROVIDED THERE IN YOUR REPORT. UM IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE ANY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BECAUSE IT IS BEING HIS OWN LINE INDUSTRIAL THAT, UM SHOULD THE LUMBER YARD CEASED TO EXIST IN WHATEVER CAPACITY THAT THERE WOULDN'T BE A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TYPE OF USE THAT WOULD GO IN THERE THAT MAY BE DETRIMENTAL TO ANY OF THE RESIDENTS THAT ARE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS. THERE IS A 100 FT SEPARATION BETWEEN THIS PROPERTY [00:30:01] AS YOU CAN SEE THAT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY WHERE THE RAILROAD RIGHT AWAY IS UM, THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DOES CALL FOR REGIONAL COMMERCIAL IN THIS AREA, WHICH REGIONAL COMMERCIAL . ONE OF THE SECONDARY USES FOR THAT IS APPROPRIATE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, SO IT DOES MEET THE INTENT OF THE CAMP PLAN. UM NOTIFICATIONS WERE MAILED OUT TO 43 SURROUNDING PROPERTY MEMBERS . WE HAD ONE RETURNED IN RESPONSE, AND, AS THE MAYOR SAID, WE'VE HAD TWO ADDITIONAL ONES. ONE ALSO IN FAVOR, UH, RESPONSE AND ONE AGAINST, UM THE PNC COMMISSION DID ASK ABOUT THE GRAVEL SURFACE THAT WAS SHOWN IN THE, UH, EXHIBIT. UM WHERE THEY LUMBER YARD ITSELF IS AND THEN ONCE IT WAS EXPLAINED, UM THAT FIRE AND ENGINEERING WERE UM. GENERALLY OKAY WITH THE IDEA FOR LACK OF BETTER WORD THEY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL 70. UM THE APPLICANT IS HERE THIS EVENING. AND, UH, I JUST HAVE TO MAKE SURE HE RUNS LATE. SOMETIMES. UM THE APPLICANTS HERE THIS EVENING AND, UH, I'LL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY? SO. BEFORE WE GET STARTED. UM THERE. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING OR THERE IS A PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENT FOR THIS ITEM. SO WITH THAT I'D LIKE TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ITEM, THEN A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC IS PRESENT AND WOULD LIKE TO STEP FORWARD AND SPEAK ON THIS ITEM. I WOULD ASK THAT YOU DO SO AT THIS TIME. MISS STORM. PLEASE LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT NO ONE HAS CHOSEN THE STEP FORWARD TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM WITH THAT I'LL CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING. AND I'LL TURN IT OVER TO COUNSEL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS FOR EITHER STAFF OR FOR THE APPLICANT. COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS. THANK YOU, MAYOR. MR HASKINS JUST TO CLARIFY SO THERE IS ALREADY A LUMBER YARD IN THE NEARBY AREA, ISN'T THERE NO, SIR . RIGHT THE ONLY THING THAT'S ON THIS PROPERTY RIGHT NOW IS AND ARE VERY OLD BUILDING. UM IT WAS BEING USED FOR STORAGE. WHAT IS ACTUALLY BEING USED FOR RIGHT NOW, THE APPLICANT COULD PROBABLY ANSWER BETTER. OKAY THAT'S IT'S IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT PROPERTY. OKAY. OKAY, UM. THAT HELPS ME GET MY BEARINGS. OKAY, THANK YOU. SO I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT, THE DETENTION POND THAT'S INDICATED ON THE HERE DOES THAT HELP TO SOLVE DETENTION ACROSS THE SITE, OR DOES THAT ONLY ASSIST THE BACK ACREAGE? JASON GREINER, WHILE THE D C UM I'VE GOT KIM LEE OR IN HERE TONIGHT AS WELL. WHOSE ENGINEERING THE SITE FOR US, AND THAT WAS ACTUALLY A TOPIC OF CONVERSATION TODAY. UM THE NEXT SLIDE, JASON. YES. OKAY, PERFECT. THE DETENTION WAS DRAWN ON HERE IS KIND OF A PLACEHOLDER THAT WOULD STILL ALLOW FOR 1.5 ACRE LUMBER YARD WHEN THEY WENT THROUGH. INCISED THIS, UM THEY ACTUALLY DETERMINED IN THE CALCULATIONS OF THE DETENTION WAS GOING TO BE A LITTLE BIT LARGER. WE CAN TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THAT, UM, LATER. BUT ESSENTIALLY, IF YOU LOOK AT THIS DEVELOPMENT, UM , APPOINTED DISTANCE, I'VE GOT A LASER POINTER HERE, UM LOT ONE IS THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY RIGHT HERE? WHAT TO IS THE ONE ADJACENT TO IT THREE AND FOUR ON LOT ONE AND LOT TO THAT THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE TO DETAIN ON THEIR OWN AND PROBABLY VIEW UNDERGROUND ATTENTION AND THEN OUTFLOW DIRECTLY INTO THE TEXT SYSTEM IN FRONT OF THEM. LOT THREE AND LOT SEVEN DO NOT HAVE TO DETAIN IN THE SYSTEM THE WAY THAT KIM LEE HORN DESIGNED IT, THERE'S SOME OPTION TO DETAIN EITHER ON LOT FOR OR DETAINED A LITTLE BIT UNLOCKED FOR FIVE AND SIX, AND THAT ALLOWS IT TO BREAK UP. WE'RE LOOKING AT COST ESTIMATES RIGHT NOW THAT ACTUALLY PROPOSE A SOLUTION. REGIONAL DETENTION SOLUTION FOR LOT FOUR AND SEE IF WE CAN SIZE THAT APPROPRIATELY TO TAKE ATTENTION OFF THE ENTIRE SIDE. IF WE CAN WHILE WE'RE GOING TO GO IN AND PUT IN THE STREETS OF DIESEL LINES AND THE ACCESS DRIVES THE WATER AND DRAINAGE AND EVERYTHING ELSE WHILE WE'RE PUTTING IN THAT INFRASTRUCTURE IF IT'S A INCREMENTAL COST INCREASE TO JUST GO AHEAD AND SOLVE THE PROBLEM FOR EVERYONE THAT WILL HELP US AVOID ANY DETENTION ISSUES BECAUSE WHEN THIS DETENTION UPON NEEDS TO BE RESIZED IT WILL LEAD INTO THEIR ACREAGE FOR THEIR LUMBER YARD. AND IF THAT HAPPENS, AND THEY'RE GOING TO NEED MORE LAND, AND IF THEY NEED MORE LAND THAN THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE MORE RUNOFF, WHICH IS GOING TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF DETENTION. IT'S A NEVER ENDING PROBLEM FOR SOME OF THESE INDIVIDUAL USERS WHERE THAT COST MIGHT BE EASIER TO MINIMIZE THE BEGINNING IF WE PUT IN THE INFRASTRUCTURE UPFRONT, SO WE'RE LOOKING AT THAT RIGHT NOW. OKAY? LONGER ANSWER THAN I EXPECTED. BUT I SHOULD I SHOULD KNOW. BUT OKAY. AND THE ONLY OTHER QUESTION I'M SURE IT'S SPELLED OUT IN THERE, BUT I JUST DON'T REMEMBER OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. WHAT IS PROPOSED FOR THAT FENCE? WHAT TYPE OF FENCE DOES IT CALL THAT OUT? I GUESS WHAT I'M [00:35:01] GETTING AT IS IT IS WILL THAT BE REQUIRED TO BE A SOLID FENCE AS OPPOSED TO CHAIN LINK? IT INDICATES A FENCE AROUND THE LUMBERYARD IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL CHAIN LINK IS ALLOWED. OKAY, BY , RIGHT. SO I MEAN, IF WE WANTED IF WE DIDN'T WANT IT TO BE CHAIN LENGTH, AND WE WOULD NEED TO WHAT'S THAT? IF YOU'RE GONNA IF YOU'RE GONNA I'LL NEED HIM TO STAY ON THE RECORD IF SHE WANTS TO. YEAH BUT LARGE CHAIN LINK IS ALLOWED IN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IF WE WANTED TO MAKE IT SOMETHING ELSE BECAUSE OF WHERE IT'S AT OR SOMETHING, THEN WE WOULD HAVE TO STATE THAT IN THE PD. UH I CAN GET WITH OUR POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PARTNER ON THIS IF THERE'S SOME DESIRE TO HAVE WHERE ADEQUATE SCREENING BOARD ON BOARD FENCE OR SOMETHING THAT PROHIBITS THAT FROM BEING SEEN OR SOME SORT OF ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION. THERE IS ALSO SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT SINCE BUILDING ONE IN THEIR CONFIGURATION, WITH THEIR OFFICE, AT LEAST BASED BUILDING TO IF THE DETENTION SHIFTS OFF SITE WHERE THEY'D ACTUALLY LIKE TO BUILD THIS THREE OR FOUR BUILDINGS, WHICH WOULD THE BUILDING COULD POTENTIALLY SCREEN SOME OF THE LUMBER YARD IF THEY GET A LITTLE BIT MORE WIDTH ON THIS PROPERTY. WE'RE STILL WORKING THROUGH THAT. MHM. ALL RIGHT. COUNCIL ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY WITH THAT, THEN WITH NONE INDICATED I WOULD BE OPEN TO EMOTIONAL. THE ITEM. COUNCILMAN DUKE. THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE OTTOMANS PRESENTED MOTION TO APPROVE HIS PRESENTED. DO WE HAVE A SECOND COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS SECOND MOTION WITH A SECOND TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS PRESENTED. COUNCIL PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WOW. MOTION IS APPROVED OR MOTION CARRIES 50 WITH COUNCILMAN STRAYING AND MAYOR PRO TEM FORRESTER ABSENT. WITH THAT WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM NUMBER FOUR, [4. Consider, and act upon, the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Dallas-Fort Worth Regional Intelligent Transportation System Partners concerning guiding principles for multi-agency communication, data, and video sharing and authorizing the City Manager to execute any necessary documents.] WHICH IS TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON THE SIGNING OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING MOU BETWEEN DALLAS FORT WORTH REGIONAL INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PARTNERS CONCERNING GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR MULTI AGENCY COMMUNICATION, DATA AND VIDEO SHARING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. MR PORTER MR MAYOR COUNCIL. THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO COME SPEAK WITH YOU TONIGHT ABOUT THIS. TO PUT SIMPLY, THIS IS A THE CITY IS IN ITS SEARCH TO FIND OTHER SOURCES OF INCOME FOR SOME UM FOR SOME OF THE PROJECTS THAT WE WOULD LIKE, UM, WE PUT TOGETHER. IT'S THE LAST PAGE OF THIS, UH, PACKET THAT YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU, BUT WE PUT TOGETHER TWO PROJECTS THAT WE SUBMITTED TO THE COBB, UM TO THEIR I T S PROGRAM. THIS IS NOT SUBMITTING IT. DOES THAT GUARANTEE THAT WE GET A PROJECT THAT'S JUST KIND OF PUTS US ON A LIST AND FUNNY BECAUSE AVAILABLE THAT THEY CAN REACH OUT TO US THIS, UH, IN ORDER TO UH, IN ORDER TO BE A ON THE LIST. UM THE COG REQUIRES THAT WE SIGNED THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND THE MEMORANDUM OF READ THROUGH IN DETAIL. I SIMPLY ASKED THAT THE CITY SHARE INFORMATION. UM BETWEEN THROUGHOUT THE REGION WITH OTHERS ABOUT UM ARE SIGNALS AND WHATNOT. UM, IT DOESN'T REQUIRE US TO GIVE ANY KIND OF VIDEO INFORMATION. IT DOESN'T. REALLY UH, IT DOESN'T REQUIRE US TO GIVE ANY MONEY AT THIS TIME IF THERE'S ANY FINANCIAL CONTRA CONTRIBUTION CITY HAS TO MAKE THERE'S A WHOLE SEPARATE AGREEMENT THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN FOR THAT. UM THIS IS A STANDARD FORM THAT ANY CITY WHO WANTS TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROGRAM. SIGNS AND SO I THOUGHT I'D BRING IT TO YOUR ATTENTION FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU, MR PORTER. AND I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO POINT OUT THAT UM, WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO WORK THROUGH WITH THIS IF I'M IF I'M READING IT CORRECTLY AND SOME OF THE POTENTIAL FUTURE PROJECTS THAT WE'RE INTERESTED IN, ARE TO TRY TO MAKE A SMARTER SYSTEM OF LIGHTS. THAT'S TRUE. IT'S TRAFFIC TRAFFIC SIGNALS TRAFFIC SIGNAL. CALL THEM LIGHTS. I KNOW HE'S GOING TO GET MAD. GET MAD AT YOU. BECAUSE LIGHTS ARE DIFFERENT THINGS. THESE ARE TRUE . THIS WOULD BE THIS WOULD BE TO TRY TO CREATE A SMARTER REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM. OBVIOUSLY THERE ARE SPECIFIC TO WILEY. BUT I KNOW SOME OF THE SOME OF THE ENTITIES NEAR US ALREADY HAVE THESE AND THEY CAN FURTHER POTENTIALLY BE INTEGRATED IN THE FUTURE. IF EVERYONE HAS A SMART SYSTEM THEY CAN THEN POTENTIALLY AGAIN BECAUSE IT INVOLVES ADDITIONAL PARTNERSHIPS. BUT TRIED TO IMPROVED TRAFFIC FLOW IN THE REGION, BOTH IN THE CITY AND THEN LONG TERM POTENTIALLY IN THE REGION. IS THAT A FAIR ASSESSMENT? YES THAT IS CORRECT. AND THE WHAT THE PROJECTS THAT THE CITY SUBMITTED TO THE COG. WHERE PROJECTS THAT THE CITY HAS BEEN, UH, REALLY INTERESTED IN [00:40:05] DOING FOR SEVERAL YEARS, WHICH IS JUST ALLOWING OUR SIGNALS TO COMMUNICATE WITH ONE ANOTHER. RIGHT NOW. THEY DON'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO THAT PROJECT ONE PROVIDES A BACKBONE, WHICH, ESSENTIALLY, YOU KNOW WAS IT WOULD BE AN ESSENTIALLY LIKE A FIBER NETWORK OR SOME KIND OF RADIO NETWORK THAT ALLOW THE SIGNALS TO SPEAK TO EACH OTHER. UM AND THEN ITEM NUMBER TWO IS TO SUPPLY MORE EQUIPMENT AT EACH SIGNAL SITE OR DIFFERENT EQUIPMENT TO HELP UPGRADE THOSE SIGNALS IN THOSE AREAS. OVERALL THE GOAL OF THE IT'S THROUGH THE COG IS TO CREATE A REGIONAL SYSTEM AND THERE ARE SOME MINIMUM STANDARDS AND WE GO FORWARD AND DESIGN THINGS THAT WOULD ALLOW US TO INTEGRATE INTO THAT SYSTEM. AND THAT'S ALL THE THEY'RE ASKING FOR HERE. OKAY? COUNCIL DO WE HAVE QUESTIONS FOR MR PORTER? COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS. OF COURSE I DO NOT MUCH QUESTION QUESTION MORE OF A STATEMENT. JUST A STATE FOR THOSE LISTENING AND THOSE HERE. UM THAT IT'S INTERESTING TO KNOW THAT THAT WE JUST TOOK OVER THE MAINTENANCE OF A LOT OF THE SIGNALS 16 OF THEM CORRECT THAT WERE HANDLED BY TEXT DOT RIGHT? YES, SO ONCE OUR POPULATION CROSSED OVER, WAS IT 50,000 THAT RIGHT NOW? WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE. SO THIS MIGHT BE AN AVENUE TO HELP FUNDING TO HELP ULTIMATELY SAVE TAX DOLLARS OUT OF THE CITY. SO WHAT? IT SOUNDS RIGHT POSSIBLE. TRUE YES, BUT STARTS HERE. YES YES, THIS IS YES. THIS IS GREAT UNDERSTANDING, POSSIBLY GET UP TO AN 80 80% FUNDING FOR FUTURE PROJECT IF THEY HAVE FUNDING FOR IT, NOT ON THE LIST. I CAN'T. I CAN'T GONNA HOLD YOU TO IT BUT TAKING OVER THE SIGNALS BECAUSE I HAVE A NUMBER IN MY MIND. WHAT WOULD YOU SAY? OUT OF THE GATE US TAKING OVER THOSE SIGNALS WHAT THAT IS. LOOKING LIKE IT'S COSTING THE CITY ESTIMATED. CURRENTLY CURRENTLY. THAT'S A THAT'S A DIFFERENT DEPARTMENT. I DON'T KNOW WHAT PUBLIC WORKS ANYMORE. I CAN I CAN ADD TO ANSWER THAT A LITTLE BIT. I KNOW WE'VE ADDED SEVERAL POSITIONS WITHIN POSITIONS WITHIN STREETS . THE NEED FOR ESSENTIALLY LONG TERM OF FULL TIME I CALLED A BUCKET TRUCK. I'M SURE I'LL GET CORRECTED. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY I GOT THAT ONE RIGHT WITH THE LAYMAN'S TERMS, BUT BUT, YEAH, THERE ARE DEFINITELY SOME EXPENSES. THAT NUMBER WAS MY POINT. MY POINT IS, IT'S IN THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS. IT'S NOT A SMALL NUMBER , RIGHT? THERE'S A YES THERE'S A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER NOT ONLY WITH OUR OWN INTERNAL STAFF, BUT THERE IS WE DO HAVE A CONTRACT WITH AN OUTSIDE VENDOR THAT SIGNAL GOES DOWN AND THE LIGHTNING STORM AFTER HOURS OR SOMETHING. THAT COMPANY COMES OUT AND FIXES THAT NOW AGAIN, THAT'S ALL RUN THROUGH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SO I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH MONEY IS BEING SPENT ON THAT NOW, MORE OF AN ADVANTAGE OF DOING THIS IS MOVING TRAFFIC. UM AND IF THE SIGNALS ARE COORDINATED WITH EACH OTHER, IT HELPS MOVE TRAFFIC. THROUGH UM AT A BETTER PACE, AND THAT'S WHAT ULTIMATELY THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO GO FOR. THANK YOU, UH, COUNCILMAN WALLACE. YEAH SO I KNOW THAT MYSELF AND MANY PEOPLE ARE SOMETIMES I GUESS CONCERNED ABOUT UH, INFORMATION SHARING. SO TO WHAT LEVEL ARE WHEN THEY SAY MEDIA DATA AND VIDEO. I MEAN, WHAT ARE THEY LOOKING FOR? WHAT ARE THEY ASKING FOR? AND WHAT CAN THEY GET? BECAUSE LIKE I SAID, SOME PEOPLE DON'T I WANT TO BE VIDEOED, UM ANYWHERE SO CORRECT . WELL TECHNICALLY, AND I READING THROUGH THIS IN MORE DETAIL. NOW I'M NOT AN I T GUY EITHER, BUT THREE INTO THIS IN MORE DETAIL. IT DOES MENTION THAT, UM BEFORE ANY KIND OF VIDEO THAT BOTH PARTIES HAVE TO AGREE BEFORE ANY VIDEO IS SHARED, HOWEVER. SIGNALS DON'T REALLY CAPTURE VIDEO. THEY DON'T RECORD VIDEO VIDEO IS SIMPLY THERE TO DETECT CARS. THERE'S NO RECORDING BEHIND IT. SO WHEN YOU'RE SHARING INFORMATION YOU WOULD YOU KNOW, YOU MAY SHARE LOCATIONS OF VEHICLE YOU MAY SHARE THE NUMBER OF CARS THAT ARE GOING THROUGH. BUT NOT INTO LIKE NOT RECORDED VIDEO OF ANY KIND. SO THAT'S NUMBER ONE AND NUMBER TWO. THIS IS THE THIS PROGRAM IS IN ITS INFANCY, AND YOU'LL NOTICE IF YOU READ THROUGH THIS DOCUMENT THAT THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT HAVEN'T BEEN DECIDED YET. AS FAR AS THE HOW THIS HOW THE CITIES ARE GOING TO INTERACT WITH ONE ANOTHER. BUT IT DOES PROVIDE PROVISIONS IN HERE THAT IF THERE'S ANY MAJOR CHANGES ALL THE, UM, ALL THE ALL THE FOLKS THAT SIGN THIS DOCUMENT NEED LIKE WILL BE A PRIZE OF THAT AND WILL REQUIRE APPROVAL OF THAT SO . SO JUST FOR CLARIFICATION [00:45:02] BECAUSE WHENEVER I RATED, IT DOES SAY, ALLOWS THE AGENCIES WHICH WOULD BE THE CITY RIGHT TO DETERMINE WHICH DATA AND VIDEO IT SHARED, SO WE WOULD STILL BE IN CONTROL. ULTIMATELY OF WHAT THEY GET. AND EVEN IF THEY'RE REQUESTING SOMETHING ELSE WE COULD DENY TO GIVE THAT TO HIM TO HIM. CORRECT. I READ IT THE SAME WAY THAT YOU DO. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. YEP, WE HAVE FOR STAFF. WITH THAT INDICATED. I WOULD BE OPEN TO EMOTION ON THIS ITEM. COUNCILMAN MAYES MOVED TO APPROVE THE ITEM AS PRESENTED. WE HAVE MOTION TO APPROVE THE ITEMS PRESENTED. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS. THANK YOU, MARIELLA. SECOND WE HAVE A MOTION TO WITH A SECOND TO APPROVE COUNCIL POLICE CAST YOUR VOTE. MOTION CARRIES 50. WITH COUNCILMAN STRING AND MAYOR PRO TEM FORRESTER. ABSENT WITH THAT, I'LL MOVE US TO A QUICK BREAK BEFORE WE MOVE INTO OUR WORK SESSIONS. [WS1. Discuss the City of Wylie's Tree Survey.] THEN I'LL CALL US BACK INTO SESSION. WE ARE MOVING INTO OUR WORK SESSIONS WORK SESSION NUMBER ONE, WHICH IS TO DISCUSS THE CITY OF WILEY. TREE SURVEY. MR TOWERS. ALRIGHTY WELL, GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL ON BEHALF OF PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT. I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THERESE IN OUR COMMUNITY. AND 2017 AND ACTUALLY IS A SLIDE UP. NO. SORRY. OKAY? SO IN 2017, THE CITY CONTRACTING WITH THE DAVY RESOURCE GROUP. TO SURVEY AND TAKE INVENTORY OF ROUGHLY 5400 TREES THROUGHOUT OUR CITY, AND THESE WERE ALL IN PUBLIC SPACES. THESE AREAS INCLUDED THE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX, WHICH IS WHAT YOU'RE SEEING RIGHT NOW. OR ATHLETIC COMPLEXES AT FOUNDERS AND COMMUNITY PARK SEVERAL OF LARGE ROADWAYS THAT WE HAVE STATE HIGHWAY 78. FM, 5 44 AND BROWN STREET. UH, AND A FEW OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS. SO THIS WAS THE FIRST STEP OF EVENTUALLY MOVING FORWARD WITH AN URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, YOU'VE GOT THE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX HERE AND EACH ONE OF THESE DOTS. REPRESENTS A SPECIFIC TREE THAT WE HAVE. ON THE NEXT SLIDE. SO THIS IS ACTUALLY ZOOMING IN ON A PARTICULAR TREE. AND THIS IS A TREE THAT'S JUST RIGHT OUTSIDE OUR DOORS HERE AT CITY HALL. IT SHOWS TO BE A CHINESE ELM AND THAT WAS BACK IN 2017. BUT AFTER THAT, OR MONTHS LATER, IT WAS ACTUALLY A IS NECKLACE. AND THEN TODAY IT IS A MULTI TRUNK LIKE SPARK ELM. SO YOU MIGHT BE ASKING. WHY ARE WE SHOWING YOU DATA OF A TREE THAT NO LONGER EXISTS? HERE. AND THE ANSWER TO THAT IS BECAUSE OF OUR CURRENT ASSET MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE THAT PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS CURRENTLY USE. THIS DOES NOT SUPPORT GIS VERY WELL. THE CURRENT SOFTWARE THAT WE'RE USING THEREFORE WE ARE UNABLE TO LOAD THE ACTUAL MAINTENANCE THAT WE DO TO THESE TREES. THE SOFTWARE IS GOING AWAY BY THE END OF THIS YEAR. THEY'RE BEING BOUGHT OUT BY ANOTHER COMPANY. SO CURRENTLY, PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS ARE LOOKING FOR ANOTHER SOFTWARE THAT CAN WORK WELL WITH G. I S MADE THE SOFTWARE THAT WE'VE ALREADY BEEN LOOKING AT. DO WORK WITH THIS TREE KEEPER SOFTWARE THAT YOU'RE SEEING RIGHT NOW. SO THE QUESTION HAS BEEN ASKED TO STAFF IF WE HAVE LOOKED OR HAD THE IDEA OF CREATING AN URBAN FORCE MASTER PLAN. THE ANSWER IS YES. AS I MENTIONED BEFORE CONDUCTING A TREE INVENTORY IS USUALLY THE FIRST STEP. HOWEVER OUR RECOMMENDATION TONIGHT IS TO HOLD OFF ON THIS PLAN. AND THE REASON WHY IS BECAUSE WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A FEW OF OUR STAFF OBTAINED AN ARBORIST LICENSE. AND THIS THIS BARBAROUS LICENSE WAR, GIVE STAFF THE TRAINING AND KNOWLEDGE. TO INVENTORY THESE TREES OURSELVES. SO THE DAVID RESOURCE GROUP IT WAS ACTUALLY. A BUNCH OF ARBORIST THAT CAME OUT AND ACTUALLY TRACKED ALL THIS DATA AND PUT IT INTO THIS SOFTWARE. BUT LIKE I SAID, WE'RE UNABLE TO USE THIS SOFTWARE OR WERE UNABLE TO CONTINUE THE LOGGING THE DATA BECAUSE THE SOFTWARE DOESN'T WORK WITH OUR ASSET MANAGEMENT. SO WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO DO IS HAVE A FEW MORE STAFF LICENSED. TAKE SOME TIME. GET SOME EXCUSE ME. HOLD ON MY SPOT HERE. ONCE WE HAVE THIS NEW SOFTWARE WHAT THE HELP OF MOBILE GPS TRACKERS. WE CAN ACTUALLY START LOGGING THIS DATA OURSELVES AND ACTUALLY EVEN INCREASE OUR INVENTORY OURSELVES. WE CAN WE NO LONGER NEED TO REACH OUT. HAVE ANOTHER [00:50:03] SURVEY. WE CAN ACTUALLY JUST LOGGING IS THAT OURSELVES IF THAT MAKES SENSE. IN ADDITION, WE HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO REMOVE AT NEW TREES AND EVEN GROW OUR INVENTORY WITHIN THE SOFTWARE. SO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS RECOMMENDATION ISN'T TO MOVE AWAY FROM FROM AN URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN. BUT TO ALLOW MORE TIME TO BRING ONLINE A BETTER SOFTWARE THAT WILL SPEAK TO THE INVENTORY. WE ALREADY HAVE. AND TO ALLOW STAFF TO BECOME TRAINED SO THAT WE CAN BETTER APPROACH THE MATERIAL THAT WE THAT WILL COME FROM AN URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN. SO WITH THAT TONIGHT WE ARE SEEKING DIRECTION FROM COUNCIL. ON WHETHER OR NOT STAFF SHOULD PURSUE REACHING OUT TO CONTRACTING FIRM TO START AN URBAN FORCE MASTER PLAN OR IF COUNSEL WOULD RATHER US YOU KNOW, TAKE THIS IN HOUSE HAVE OUR STAFF BECOME LICENSED, AND IT'S A. IT'S A SHORT CLASS. IT'S A DON'T WANT TO SAY IT'S AN EASY EXAM. IT'S IT LOOKS TO BE PRETTY TOUGH. IT'S VERY INEXPENSIVE. UM BUT IF WE CAN GET A FEW OF OUR STAFF LICENSED WE CAN GET THE MOBILE GPS TRACKERS AND ACTUALLY START LOGGING THIS DATA. HOPEFULLY BY THE END OF THIS YEAR EARLY NEXT YEAR, WHEN PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS HAVE A NEW SOFTWARE, WE CAN ACTUALLY UPLOAD THIS DATA OURSELVES. SO THAT IS THE DIRECTION THAT WE'RE LOOKING FROM. COUNCIL ON WHICH WAY YOU WOULD LIKE FOR US TO PURSUE. AND WITH THAT I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY? I'LL OPEN IT UP TO YOU ANY QUESTIONS THAT WE HAVE FOR STAFF? COUNCILMAN MINUS. WELL THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. I REALLY DO APPRECIATE IT AND IT'S SO COOL TO SEE THE I S SOFTWARE THAT YOU'VE GOT THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN IMPLEMENTED AND UTILIZED AND WHEN I FIRST BROUGHT THIS IDEA TO COUNCILMAN DUKE AND I'M I'M SO GRATEFUL THAT HE, UM YOU KNOW, SECONDED THIS FOR DISCUSSION TONIGHT. UM IN LEARNING ABOUT IT. I WAS SURPRISED TO LEARN THAT WE ALREADY HAD DONE SOME OF THIS WORK AND INFORMATION, NOT SURPRISED THAT IT HAD ALREADY BEEN DONE BECAUSE WE'VE HAD MUCH GOOD. FORESIGHT BY PRIOR COUNSEL AND STAFF MEMBERS, BUT I WAS JUST IMPRESSED BY THE DATA THAT WE ALREADY HAVE. BUT I'M REALLY GLAD TO LEARN TONIGHT ABOUT THE CHALLENGES THAT WE HAVE WITH THEIR CURRENT SYSTEM RIGHT AND KEEPING THAT GOING FORWARD. AND YOU KNOW, MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE YOU KNOW, LOOKING TO DO IT IN A SUSTAINABLE WAY SO THAT THE DATA IS USEFUL AND RELIABLE AND SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO UPDATE, UM YOU KNOW, THE REASON I WANTED TO BRING THIS TO THE AGENDA TONIGHT IS BECAUSE DURING MY TIME ON COUNCIL I'VE HEARD FROM SO MANY RESIDENTS, UH, WHEN I WERE A YOUNG CITY RELATIVELY IN TERMS OF OUR DEVELOPMENT, A LOT OF INSTILL DEVELOPING RIGHT SO EVERY TIME WE HAVE A DEVELOPMENT , THERE IS OFTEN A LOSS OF TREES AND GREENERY. SO PEOPLE, I THINK YOU KNOW? ARE SAD WHEN THAT HAPPENS AND HAVE EXPRESSED THAT TO ME AS THE REPRESENTATIVE, SO I THOUGHT, YOU KNOW WHAT IS SOMETHING WE CAN DO AS A CITY TO BE PROACTIVE RIGHT TO ADD TO THE TREES THAT WE HAVE IN OUR COMMUNITY AND OUR CITY, UM TO ADDRESS THAT THAT VERY VALID CONCERN THAT PEOPLE HAVE UM WE'RE LUCKY TO BE DESIGNATED BY A TREE CITY BY THE ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION. BUT YOU KNOW, THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO GO EVEN BEYOND THAT, WITH THE TWO OPTIONS THAT YOU PRESENTED TO US TODAY, POTENTIAL PATHS THAT WE COULD TAKE. UM AND IN TERMS OF AN URBAN FORESTRY MASTER PLAN. I THINK YOU KNOW, THAT'D BE GREAT, RIGHT AND LOOKING AT SOME OF THE OTHER CITIES. THEY'VE THEY'VE GONE TO A REALLY HIGH LEVEL, AND I THINK THAT SHOULD MAYBE BE OUR ASPIRATION FOR THE FUTURE, BUT WE NEED TO START SMALL START MODESTLY, SO THAT WE CAN, YOU KNOW, BEGIN TO TOOL OURSELVES UP AND, UH AND I REALLY DO LIKE THE IDEA OF ESPECIALLY SINCE IT'S AN EXPENSIVE EQUIPPING OUR STAFF WITH THE ABILITY TO DO THAT AS WELL, BECAUSE I THINK THAT WOULD BE A MORE SUSTAINABLE LONG TERM. UM WAY TO GIVE OURSELVES THE TOOLS TO WORK ON THIS ON INCREMENTAL BASIS ON A SCHEDULED BASIS, WHATEVER MAKES SENSE FOR THE CITY OF WYLIE VERSUS HAVING TO PAY A LARGE, EXPENSIVE AMOUNT . YOU KNOW, WHENEVER WE DECIDE WE NEED TO UPDATE OUR PLAN TO A CONSULTANT. I SEE POTENTIAL COST SAVINGS BUT ALSO THE POTENTIAL TO DEVELOP. YOU KNOW, WITH SOME WITHIN OUR STAFF AND EXPERIENCE WITHIN OUR STAFF TO DO THIS, UM BUT I REALLY APPRECIATE COUNCILMAN DUKE SECONDING THIS AND HELPING TO MAKE THE FOCUS ON . MUNICIPAL PROPERTY, RIGHT? I THINK THAT WOULD BE A GREAT PLACE TO START LOOKING AT PUBLIC [00:55:02] FACING MUNICIPAL PROPERTY. UM AND ULTIMATELY I AGREE WITH YOU THAT WE CAN'T REALLY START UP AND URBAN FORESTRY MASTER PLAN WITHOUT YOU KNOW, HAVING THE RIGHT CREDENTIALS AND KNOWLEDGE AND BACKGROUND TO DO THAT, BUT I DO THINK WE STILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BEGIN WITH A VERY MODEST PLAN OR GOAL STATED GOAL DIRECTION THAT WE CAN PROVIDE THE STAFF. TO GET TO THE POINT WHERE WE HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO DO THAT, SO I THAT WOULD BE MY RECOMMENDATION AND I WOULD AGREE WITH THAT. UM BUT ANYWAY, I'VE TALKED ENOUGH SO I'D LOVE TO HEAR WHAT MY COLLEAGUES THINK AS WELL. THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS. THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS. THANK YOU, MAYOR. SO I WOULD ENCOURAGE ALL WHICH I THINK YOU'RE PROBABLY WITH USING THE G I S INFORMATION ALONG THE LINES OF JUST MAKING SURE THAT YOU GET THE DATA, OR YOU CAN DO A HOLISTIC APPROACH TO EVERYTHING THAT YOU MANAGE, SO IT'S NOT JUST A TREE SOFTWARE. IT'S THE TREES AND THE GRASS. IT'S THE YOU KNOW ALL THE THINGS THAT YOU ALL MANAGE AND GET IT ALL WHERE IT'S UNDER YOUR UMBRELLA. UM AND WHERE YOU'VE GOT CONTROL OF THE DATA SHOULD ACCOMPANY POOL OR DO WHAT? THIS COMPANY YOU KNOW, SEEK TO LIKE, STOP SERVICING THE THAT SOFTWARE . YOU'LL STILL HAVE THAT DATA WHERE YOU CAN GET IT OUT AND DO WHATEVER YOU NEED WITH IT. BUT I'D BE IN FULL SUPPORT OF THAT. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. AND I JUST WANNA UM, ADD TO THAT AS WELL. I WOULD THIS HAS BEEN ADDING ALL OF THIS TO GIS HAS BEEN LIKE A GOAL OF US SOMETHING EVEN TO IRRIGATION. I MEAN, I WOULD LIKE TO PUT EVERY SINGLE IRRIGATION VALVE THAT WE HAVE EVERY AND YOUR WORK CONSTANTLY AT ALL THESE PARKS LOOKING FOR UM YOU KNOW DIFFERENT PLANS OF THESE SYSTEMS AND EVERYTHING BUT ALL OF IT. I AGREE WITH YOU. ALL OF IT NEEDS TO BE N G. I S SO YEAH. BE A GOOD GOAL. THANKS, MAN. OKAY. COUNCILMAN WALLACE. I JUST LIKE TO SAY THAT I DEFINITELY LIKE THE IDEA. I THINK IT ALSO ALLOWS FOR US TO HAVE SOME VARIATION BECAUSE I MEAN THERE ARE MANY TIMES WHERE THINGS HAVE OCCURRED, AND THERE'S JUST THE SAME TREE OVER AND OVER, AND SOMETIMES IT'S A SOFTER WOOD OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO IT'S STORM DAMAGE AND THINGS LIKE THAT. I KNOW TO SOME DEGREE WHERE LIMITED BY WHAT WOULD SURVIVE IN OUR ENVIRONMENT. WELL, BUT, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, MANY PEOPLE. AND EVEN THOUGH IT WOULD NOT BE IMMEDIATE, BUT THEY LIKE TO SEE THE OLD TALL TREES. NOW SEVERAL THAT WILL BE FOR THOSE THAT ARE 50 AND 80 YEARS BEHIND US, BUT AT LEAST IT WOULD SET THE SET THE FOOTPRINT FOR IT. AND SO, UM, I THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA. COUNCILMAN DUKE I THINK, MR MARIO, I THINK GREAT IDEA. OKAY? AND I'M JUST GOING TO MAKE SURE I CLARIFIED FROM MY COLLEAGUE. SO THAT COUNCILMAN MY YOU MADE IT PRETTY CLEAR YOU WERE HAPPY WITH THE DIRECTION THEY WERE GOING TO OBTAIN LICENSES SO THAT THEY CAN AND SOFTWARE SO THEY CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH ONE THAT'S INTERNAL, AND THAT THEY CAN UPDATE THEMSELVES. I'D LIKE TO ASK MY COLLEAGUES THAT THEY AGREE BECAUSE THEY DID ASK FOR SPECIFIC DIRECTION BETWEEN THAT OR AN EXTERNAL UM, CONSULTANT. UM AND EVERYONE. I AGREE, LIKE THE IDEA AS WELL. I'M GLAD WE'VE GOT A BASIS IN PLACE AND A PLAN TO MOVE FORWARD. BUT THEY DO NEED DIRECTION FROM US. I WILL SAY I AGREE WITH COUNCILMAN MAYES AND STAFF'S REQUEST. I THINK HAVING INDIVIDUALS WITH THAT KNOWLEDGE ON HAND THAT CAN UPDATE IT THEMSELVES AND UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE NUANCES OF IT. UM, IS BETTER THAN GOING OUT. I'LL SAY INFREQUENTLY OR SETTING A FIVE YEAR DATE AND CONSTANTLY PAYING SOMEONE TO COME IN FROM OUTSIDE WHEN YOU ALL WOULD HAVE THE FLEXIBILITY BASED ON EVER CHANGING DEVELOPMENT AND THINGS THAT HAPPEN TO MAKE THOSE CHANGES INTERNALLY AND MAYBE WE LOSE FIVE TREES HERE, SO YOU ADD FIVE TO ANOTHER AREA IN THE PLAN OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. WITHOUT HAVING TO GO OUTSIDE. UM SO I'LL ASK MY COLLEAGUES, COUNCILMAN WALLACE. I AGREE. I THINK IT SHOULD BE DONE AS MUCH IN HOUSE AS POSSIBLE BECAUSE AGAIN WHO KNOWS OUR CITY BETTER THAN US IN THE FIRST PLACE. EVEN THOUGH CAN CONSULTANTS. THEY'RE PROFESSIONALS AT WHAT THEY DO, BUT YOU KNOW WE LIVE HERE, SO I THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA TO HAVE IT IN THE HOUSE AND GET THE ADDITIONAL TRAINING. COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS IN HOUSE COUNCILMAN DO I'M GOOD WITH EITHER WAY. ACTUALLY, I'M NOT ON THE GROUND SO I CAN'T SEE WHERE WERE THE CAN FOR VIEWERS, BUT YOU KNOW, I CAN. YOU KNOW IF YOU THINK YOU CAN DO IT IN THE HOUSE GOING HOUSE IF YOU THINK IT'S BETTER TO FARM IT OUT AND FARM IT OUT. OKAY? THAT APPEARS TO GIVE YOU YOUR DIRECTION. SO IF YOU GUYS WILL CONTINUE MOVING FORWARD WITH ACQUIRING SOFTWARE THAT INTEGRATES AS WELL AS GETTING THAT ADDITIONAL EDUCATION SOUNDS LIKE THAT'S THE DIRECTION FROM COUNCIL. THANK YOU, COUNCILMAN, MICE AND DUKE FOR THE DISCUSSION THIS EVENING AND STAFF FOR YOUR [01:00:05] WORK ON THIS AS WELL. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. WITH THAT I WILL MOVE US TO WORK SESSION TO WHICH [WS2. Discuss property surrounding the northern peninsula of Lavon Lake.] IS TO DISCUSS PROPERTY SURROUNDING THE NORTHERN PENINSULA OF LAKE LABAN. MISS ALI. YES MAYOR AND COUNCIL. UM. ALSO HAVE MR JOE HAMBURGER REPRESENTING, UM KIMBERLY HORN, WHO REPRESENTS THE CITY OF PRINCETON. AND. UM, TRYING TO LOAD. SOMEBODY TOOK IT OFF, I THINK IS THAT THE PRINCETON COMBINED IT'S ON THE DESKTOP. OKAY, THERE WE GO. THANK YOU. NO PROBLEM. I SAW THE NAME SO I ASSUMED IT WAS RELATED, BUT YES, THANK YOU. SEE. THERE WE GO. CLICK THAT RIGHT? NO, IT'S IN THE PDF. OKAY WELL, ANYWAY CLOSE, BUT. THERE WE GO SOMEWHAT. OKAY SO THE ITEM BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING, UM. REALLY TO GET DIRECTION. DO WE WANT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH LOOKING AT D ANNEX SEEN AREA AND THIS IS THE NORTH POLE PENINSULA. SO THIS AREA HERE FOR MY CURSOR IS THAT'S THE INTERMODAL AREA SO ACROSS THE LAKE SO REALLY? WE'RE TALKING ALL THIS AREA KIND OF THAT'S HIGHLIGHTED. IN RED. AND. MR HAMBURGER COME UP LATER AND CAN EXPLAIN THE REASONING THE WHY BEHIND IT FOR PRINCETON. UM BUT WHAT THIS ENTAILS IS ROUGHLY 3800. 3850 ACRES. OF THAT ONLY 20% IS ACTUALLY LAND SO ABOUT 700 ACRES IS LAND. ANOTHER 2800 IS WATER. ALL THE LAND IS OWNED BY THE CORE. SO IT IS UNTAXED, ABLE, CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED, UM . I DON'T WANT TO SAY NOT USEFUL, BUT I'M GOING TO ASSUME THAT THEY'RE HOPING TO POTENTIALLY PARTNERED WITH THE COURT OF TURNED IT INTO SOME SORT OF A PARK OR SOMETHING. NO, NO. YEAH. JUST GONNA BE THERE. AND THIS PIECE OF THIS IS CLEAR LAKE PARK, WHICH WE DIS ANNEXED IN 1999. AND THERE, THERE'S ANOTHER LITTLE PIECE HERE THAT'S ACTUALLY OUTSIDE OF THE CITY LIMITS AND YOU KNOW, WAY BEFORE ANY OF OUR TIME. I HAVE NO IDEA WHY WE WENT AROUND THAT AREA AND DIDN'T AN ACCIDENT. BUT THEN A LITTLE BIT MORE. YOU CAN. WANT ADVANCE. HERE WE GO. SO THIS KIND OF IS A FORM APP SO ROUGHLY FROM HERE ALL THE WAY AROUND TO ABOUT RIGHT HERE. IS WHAT'S IN CITY LIMITS. THIS AREA WOULD BE . ADDITIONAL AREA THAT PRINCETON WOULD ANNEX TO BE CONTINUOUS TO THEIR CURRENT UH UM. CITY LIMITS. THAT'S NOT ME. OH, SO YOU HAVE YOUR CELL PHONE WITH YOU THIS EVENING. WE DO ASK THAT YOU PLACE IT ON, VIBRATE OR STEP OUT TO OUR ATRIUM. IF YOU NEED TO TAKE A CALL. SO THIS AREA HERE. THIS IS WHERE INSTANCE CURRENT CITY LIMITS IN AND BY LAW TO ANNEX YOU HAVE TO BE CONTINUOUS, SO THIS CORE PROPERTY WOULD BE CONTINUED TO THEIR EXISTING PROPERTY, AND THAT WAY THEY COULD GET IT ALL ANNEX. UM JUST REAL QUICK. SOME OF THE CONSIDERATIONS THE SEWER IS WOULD BE PROVIDED BY PRINCETON. WE DON'T HAVE ANY SERVICES OUT. THERE IS NOT OUR WATER CCN. IT'S UM I DON'T EVEN HAVE TO SAY IT. THAT COLLEAGUE COKIE CULLEOKA. SIR, YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO SPEAKING ON THE ON [01:05:07] THE RECORD FOR ME, I CAN'T SAY THAT ON THE RECORD. UM AGAIN, SOME OF THE THINGS TO CONSIDER, UM AGAIN, ALL CORE PROPERTY. VERY LITTLE LAND. UM. LONG WAY FOR US TO GET OVER TO THAT SIDE OF THE LAKE. UM, UM, BOTH CHIEFS ONE CHEESE IS HERE. YOU KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON HOW THEY DO THE FIRE RECENTLY PRINCETON HAS TAKEN OVER BRANCH BRANCH. BRANCH FIRE DEPARTMENT. SO THAT HELPS, UM SO THAT'S WHAT I'M PRESENTING. AND THE DIRECTION THAT I REALLY NEED IS DO YOU WANT US TO MOVE FORWARD THIS BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE SOME WORK? AND WILL NEED TO GET MEETS INBOUNDS, SO PRINCETON WOULD COVER THAT. SO WE JUST REALLY WANTED TO KNOW IF YOU WANTED US TO MOVE FORWARD BEFORE WE START DIGGING DEEP, AND IT WOULD HAVE TO BE AN ORDINANCE SO WE WOULD BRING BACK IF YOU GIVE US THE DIRECTION TO MOVE FORWARD. WE WOULD DRAFT AN ORDINANCE THAT WOULD COME BACK TO YOU. FOR US TO D ANNEX AND THE CORE IS ON BOARD WITH THIS. AND THEN PRINCETON WOULD AFTER THAT FOLLOW UP WITH AN ANNEXATION PROCESS THROUGH THEIR CITY TO AN EXCELLENT INTO INTO PRINCETON. OKAY SO I'VE GOT THREE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO ASK, AND I THINK YOU CAN COVER THE FIRST. THE FIRST IS THE EXPENSE OF GETTING ALL THE MEATS AND BOUNDS AND EVERYTHING COVERED. IS PRINCETON COVERING 100% OF THE COSTS OF ESSENTIALLY ALL THE SURVEY AND MEATS AND BOUNDS THAT IS THE ASK OKAY, WHAT I HAVE ASKED FROM MY STANDPOINT, THAT WOULD BE YES. THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING FROM FOR ME SINCE THEY'RE THE ONES WHO WILL BE GETTING THE PROPERTY FROM US. I WOULD WANT THEM TO COVER THAT. MY SECOND QUESTION IS, I KNOW THIS LITTLE ODD PENINSULA THAT WE HAVE. OVER HERE, THE LOWEST ONE ON THE RIGHT BOTTOM RIGHT THERE THAT COZ THAT JUTS OUT ALMOST ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BOMB. THAT ONE THAT'S IN CITY LIMITS STILL HAVE CONTIGUOUS. WILL WE STILL BE CONTIGUOUS TO THAT? YES BECAUSE BECAUSE IT DOESN'T SHOW WHERE OURS LOVE BONDS. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE IT DOESN'T LEAD THAT AS AN ABANDONED PIECE THAT WE THEN ALSO HAVE TO DMX CONTIGUOUS. AND THEN THE THIRD ONE WAS AND I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S FOR YOU OR IF IT WILL BE FOR CHIEF BLIGH. BUT UM, WITH THE ADDITIONAL LAKE FOOTAGE SO TO SPEAK, THAT THEY WOULD BE BRINGING INTO PRINCETON. ARE THEY GOING TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO THAT? OR WILL IT STILL BE ON US? I KNOW WE DO MOST OF THE SWIFT WATER AND WE HAVE OUR OUR CREW THAT IN OUR BOATS, AND I BELIEVE HOVERCRAFT THAT GO OUT THERE. WILL THEY BE? ABLE TO, I GUESS PROVIDES SERVICES TO THOSE AREAS OF THE LAKE. UM BECAUSE I KNOW IN THE PAST, IT'S ESSENTIALLY FALLEN ON US. AND I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE NOT JUST GOING TO BE MUTUAL AID FOR EVERYTHING ON THE LAKE, EVEN THOUGH IT BECOMES PART OF PRINCETON. YEAH, AND I TALKED TO RENEE ABOUT THIS, UM AND EXPRESS SOME CONCERN ABOUT THAT. SO, UM, KIND OF AN UPDATE. PRINCETON NOW HAS BRANCHES BOAT . UM AND THEN LUCAS FIRE DEPARTMENT JUST GOT A BOAT FOR THAT WEST SIDE NORTH OF THE OF THE LONG BRIDGES UP THERE, SO THE WAY WE'VE BEEN HANDLING IT IS WE'VE ALL BEEN RESPONDING TO ANY LIKE EMERGENCY OUT THERE BECAUSE NUMBER ONE. IF IT IS A TRUE LIKE EMERGENCY, WE NEED THE MANPOWER AND THE EXTRA BOATS. NUMBER TWO, UM EVERYBODY'S ALWAYS AT THE DAM, COLIN PARK OR THE POWER PLANT. IT DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER ACTUALLY AT THAT'S WHAT THEY TELL US. AND SO WHOEVER CAN GET THERE, THE FASTEST, UM AND WITH THEM TAKING OVER THAT BRANCH STATION. THERE IS SOME, YOU KNOW THERE ARE A LOT CLOSER THAN THEY THAN THEY ONCE WERE. OKAY? YEAH, AGAIN. I JUST I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE ARE SAFE AND NOW THAT'S FIRST PRIORITY, BUT THE SECOND IS MAKING SURE THAT IF THEY WANT TO TAKE ON THE CHALLENGE OF THAT ADDED SPACE FOR LACK OF A BETTER TERM THAT ADDED WATER. THAT THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO ASSIST WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE IN DISTRESS IN THOSE AREAS. UNDERSTANDING OF RENE MAY HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL, I DON'T THINK THAT WAS THE ORIGINAL INTENT WAS THE WATER. HOWEVER BECAUSE IT WAS NEVER REPLANTED WHEN THE LAKE WAS BUILT WAS WAS WHEN WE DISCUSSED IT. SOME OF THOSE THOSE OLD TRACKS OF LAND STILL EXTEND OUT INTO THE LAKE AND SO TO GET THE TO GET THE SHORE LINE. YOU HAVE TO GET THE TRACK THAT'S IN THE UNDERWATER AS WELL. SO I DON'T THINK IT WILL BE AN ISSUE. WE ALL WORK WELL TOGETHER. UM AND WE ALL RESPOND OUT THERE ALREADY, ANYWAY. OKAY? THANK YOU. THAT HELPS. AND I'M GOING TO SOON CHIEF HENDERSON. NO CONCERNS. ABOUT THE ANNEXATION ON THIS. OKAY? THOSE WERE MY QUESTIONS, [01:10:04] COUNCIL AND THE OTHER QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE ON THIS. COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS. THANK YOU, MAYOR. SO, MISS ALI THE QUESTION I HAVE SO I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY CHANCE IN THE WORLD THAT THE CORE IS GONNA TURN. LAVONNE INTO LEASABLE SPACE ON THE PERIMETER. AT ALL EVER. NOT LIKE THEY DID RIGHT, HEBERT. I DON'T THAT SET ASIDE. IF THEY DID. WOULD THE INCOME BE TAXABLE? THAT CAME FROM, UH FROM THAT LEASE OR FROM BUSINESSES THAT WERE ON THE ON THE SHORE IF THEY JUST LEASE IT, OR IF THEY SELL IT. LEAST I DON'T THINK I DON'T THINK SO. NOT IF IT'S JUST LEAST SO. YOU DON'T FORESEE ANY POSSIBLE LOSS OF TAX REVENUE IN THE FUTURE. I DON'T THANK YOU. 10. SO IF WE DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, THEN I WILL ASK DIRECTION. I KIND OF GAVE MINE UM WAS THERE ANYTHING? SO I GUESS I'LL GO FIRST ON THIS ONE SINCE I WENT LAST ON THE TREES FOR ME, I'M FINE WITH MOVING FORWARD WITH THE PROCESS, BUT I WOULD EXPECT IT TO BE PAID FOR BY PRINCETON SINCE THEY'RE THE ONES MAKING THIS REQUEST BECAUSE OTHERWISE WE WOULD NOT BE PUTTING THE COST FORWARD AS WE WOULD HAVE NO REASON. BUT THAT WOULD BE MINE, SO I'LL START. WITH THE LEFT COUNCILMAN. UM LIKE I'M IN? NO, THANK YOU, MR MAYOR. I'M IN AGREEMENT WITH ME. IT IS SO LONG AS A PRINCETON PAYS FOR IT. OKAY? COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS QUESTION OR JUST AN AGREEMENT, OKAY? AND COUNCILMAN WALLACE. I AGREE. OKAY. COUNCILMAN MAYES. I DON'T KNOW THAT I'M IN 100% AGREEMENT. I MEAN, I'M I'M IT'S ALWAYS A LOSS TO LOSE A BIT OF WIDELY SO THAT IT MAKES ME CONCERNED, YOU KNOW, JUST ABOUT POTENTIAL FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES. I AGREE THAT IT'S EXTREMELY UNLIKELY THAT WE'RE GOING TO SEE DEVELOPMENT WITH THE CORE IN TERMS OF MOVING TO MAKE THIS MORE RECREATIONALLY ACCESSIBLE. OR THINGS OF THAT NATURE OR POTENTIALLY TAXABLE IF THEY WERE TO TRANSFER OWNERSHIP OF IT VERY UNLIKELY. UM AND I COMPLETELY RESPECT PRINCETON'S REQUEST TO DO THIS, BUT I SEE IT. UM AS YOU KNOW, JUST MOVING FROM FROM ONE CITY TO ANOTHER. UM, BUT, YOU KNOW, STILL, IT WILL REQUIRE THE SAME SERVICES AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE, SO I LEAN TOWARDS THE STATUS QUO. UM, BUT I RESPECT FOR INSTANCE, REQUESTS AND MY COLLEAGUES OPINIONS ON IT. OKAY? SO YOU HAVE DIRECTION FROM US. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT WITH THAT. I'LL MOVE US OUT OF [EXECUTIVE SESSION] WORK SESSION BACK IN THE REGULAR SESSION. AND THEN FROM THERE, I'LL MOVE US INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION. UNDER 551.74 PERSONNEL MATTERS. CLOSED MEETING IS ONE DISCUSSED THE JOB PERFORMANCE OF THE CITY MANAGER SECTION 5510 17 DELIBERATION REGARDING REAL PROPERTY CLOSED MEETING THE S TO CONSIDER THE SAILOR ACQUISITION OF PROPERTIES LOCATED AT BALLARD, BROWN, BROWN EUBANKS AND 5 44. COOPER FM, 5 44 CENT AND IF IN 13, 78 PARKER JACKSON, OAK REGENCY STEEL STATE HIGHWAY, 78 ALLEN, THE STATE HIGHWAY 78 BALLAD. AND SEE HOW WE SUBMITTED BROWN AND 551.87 DELIBERATION REGARDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS. E S THREE DELIBERATION REGARDING COMMERCIAL OR FINANCIAL INFORMATION THAT THE W. E. D C HAS RECEIVED FROM A BUSINESS PROSPECTS AND TO DISCUSS THE OFFER INCENTIVES FOR PROJECTS 2013-98 2017 68 2021 AS TWO D 2021-58 2021 DASH. IT'S A 2021 THAT SUCCEED 2021 S 88 2021-98 2021 X NINE B 2021-9 F 2021 2022-9 I 2022-1 B 2022-40. 2022-7 B 2022-8 B 2022 DASH MINUS 2022-10 D 2022-11 8 2022-12 8 2023-18 2023-1 B 2023-1 C 2023. THAT'S TWO A 2023 . THAT'S TO BE 2023 DASH TO SEE 2023 DISH DUTY 2023-2 E 2023-3 A AND 2023 DASH. THREE B. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.